Nakamura said in a podcast all he would need to know is that there is a winning move and he'd be able to find it.
So, just one buzz is enough that says "in this position there is a move that wins the game".
Kinda like everyone's ratings in puzzles is higher than in elo because by the very nature of the puzzle there is a winning sequence to find.
In play, if I don't spot a winning tactic I just move to (try to) improve my position. In puzzles if I don't spot a winning tactic, I look again, and again, and again…
Have an accomplice feeding the game into a computer to figure out the best move to make next.
Send the information to the chess player using Morse code butt vibrations.
Nakamura said in a podcast all he would need to know is that there is a winning move and he'd be able to find it.
So, just one buzz is enough that says "in this position there is a move that wins the game".
Kinda like everyone's ratings in puzzles is higher than in elo because by the very nature of the puzzle there is a winning sequence to find.
In play, if I don't spot a winning tactic I just move to (try to) improve my position. In puzzles if I don't spot a winning tactic, I look again, and again, and again…
Yes, that would be easier to keep track, and less risk of accidentally cumming.
Now that's dedication to winning the sport. Ingenuity knows no bounds.
I see, a wide array of skills and strict organisation.