produnis@discuss.tchncs.de to Lefty Memes@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 1 year agofair share?discuss.tchncs.deimagemessage-square616fedilinkarrow-up12.16Karrow-down176
arrow-up12.09Karrow-down1imagefair share?discuss.tchncs.deprodunis@discuss.tchncs.de to Lefty Memes@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square616fedilink
minus-squareIHaveTwoCows@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoBanning PAC money would di the same thing but literally zero representatives are proposing bills to do that.
minus-squarehark@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoWith or without PACs, the money will find its way into politicians' pockets.
minus-squareIHaveTwoCows@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoSo in what way exactly is making that statement helpful?
minus-squarehark@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoIt's to point out that banning PACs, while a good move, wouldn't solve the problem. A wealth tax would be much more effective.
Banning PAC money would di the same thing but literally zero representatives are proposing bills to do that.
With or without PACs, the money will find its way into politicians' pockets.
So in what way exactly is making that statement helpful?
It's to point out that banning PACs, while a good move, wouldn't solve the problem. A wealth tax would be much more effective.