• Flumsy@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    They seem to provide some kind of vakue to you, otherwise you could just buy a house.

    • doleo@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You could just buy a house.

      Can you just step back from the keyboard and realize how stupid what you've just said is?

      • Flumsy@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        The fact that you cant buy a house shows that your landlord is providing value to you, because they make living there affordable where it would otherwise be unaffordable.

        My statement still stands: IF they werent providing any value to you (eg. making living there more affordable) then you could just buy a house. (But they do provide value which is why you can afford to rent but not afford to buy a house).

        • doleo@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Paying a higher amount in rent than a mortgage would be is not making living affordable. They're exploiting the fact that many people can't access credit or afford to make a required down payment/stamp duty/legal fees, etc. up front.

          • Flumsy@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Alright but wouldnt you then say banks, for example, are also exploiting you (because you have to pay an interest when takking out a loan)? Isnt that also exploiting the fact that many people dont have the money upfront"?