Parents who shout at their children or call them “stupid” are leaving their offspring at greater risk of self-harm, drug use and ending up in jail, new research claims.

Talking harshly to children should be recognised as a form of abuse because of the huge damage it does, experts say.

The authors of a new study into such behaviour say “adult-to-child perpetration of verbal abuse … is characterised by shouting, yelling, denigrating the child, and verbal threats”.

“These types of adult actions can be as damaging to a child’s development as other currently recognised and forensically established subtypes of mistreatment such as childhood physical and sexual abuse,” the academics say in their paper in the journal Child Abuse & Neglect.

  • HubertManne@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    33
    ·
    1 year ago

    this. things like this are starting to annoy me. lets me clear. sexual abuse is worse than physical abuse which is worse than verbal abuse. The first should never happen in the least. Grabbing your childs arm roughly and yelling at them when about to touch something hot is fine and expected. Yelling at them and telling them to behave when they hit their sibling is fine.

      • HubertManne@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        22
        ·
        1 year ago

        using equivalency phrases on things that are very much not equivalent. Also scientific studies are great in the hard sciences but in the social sciences become very iffy. Doing some correlation on questionaires is not equivalent to measuring small changes in a large structure to measure gravitational effects.

        • protist@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Doing some correlation on questionaires is not equivalent to measuring small changes in a large structure to measure gravitational effects.

          Where did anyone say this? You're trying to sound knowledgeable about science, but all you're doing is making up strawmen to argue against over and over

          • HubertManne@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            17
            ·
            1 year ago

            its a reply to iamthetots comment about scientific studies. one thing that is frustrating with federation is sometimes folks don't see all the people or parts of a convo

            • protist@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              1 year ago

              I read that comment, that doesn't change the fact that you're creating strawman arguments

              • HubertManne@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                13
                ·
                1 year ago

                explain strawman argument and how my conversation fits into it because I do not believe my conversation has been one. Or not if you don't really believe its a strawman argument. Make some other comment if thats the case.

    • GBU_28@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think there's a missed distinction here.

      "Yelling" at your child to get them to stop something, or not step into traffic, or not eat pills is one thing. That's certainly not verbal abuse.

      Shaming and berating your child for getting a C, telling them they are worthless, they are the reason Dad left, they are ugly is very different. This is clearly verbal abuse.

      It's conceivable that the sustained verbal abuse as I defined it could absolutely harm a child in a long term way, and cumulatively have an impact similar to physical abuse.

    • protist@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You're completely misunderstanding everything written here. You created arguments that don't exist in this article, and do not understand the definition of verbal or physical abuse, because the examples you give are not that

      • HubertManne@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        except that there is no hard line of where something moves into abuse. In the end my comment was that yes these are not equivalent. There is no level of sexual contact that is ok but there is a level of physicality and yelling that is ok as long as it is not type of constant thing. and physicality is way less ok than yelling and only should be used in rare, usually dangerous situations.

        • protist@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Ok, but again, you're arguing against a strawman. Nothing you're saying here is relevant to what I said about you misunderstanding the definitions of physical and verbal/emotional abuse as evidenced by you standing up and knocking down examples that are clearly not abuse

          • HubertManne@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            1 year ago

            yeah but you are taking a whole conversation and not looking at my initial comment. you just don't get the jist of the whole and where it goes. you concentrate on the last thing said and take no context at all.

              • HubertManne@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                11
                ·
                1 year ago

                So where is the effin straw man in that. The news item that references the study equates sexual, physical, and verbal abuse as equivalent and my comment is woa. They are so not!!!

                • protist@mander.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Grabbing your childs arm roughly and yelling at them when about to touch something hot is fine and expected. Yelling at them and telling them to behave when they hit their sibling is fine.

                  There is no one saying these things aren't fine. They give examples of verbal/emotional abuse in the article and study and they are not this. You are creating a strawman argument no one is saying (grabbing your childs arm when about to touch something hot is fine; yelling at them and telling them to behave when they hit their sibling is fine) and using that as a reason to dismiss the conclusions of this study

                  • HubertManne@kbin.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    9
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    My argument is about equivalency. When they make the statement they are equivalent they are saying they are equivalent. My argument is not about abuse vs not abuse. Its about equivalency. There is no level of sexual situations with a child that is not abuse. there is with verbal and physical. Again you just are throwing out context and trying to make it something its not.

    • aberrate_junior_beatnik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Grabbing your childs arm roughly and yelling at them when about to touch something hot is fine and expected.

      Is it really? Honestly I'd rather a child touch something hot and learn the lesson that it is unsafe than potentially learn the lesson the people charged with taking care of them are unsafe. I mean, I remember burning a finger on the stove when I was little. It sucked but I was and am fine. I was lightly verbally abused by my Dad exactly once (he apologized after), and it was much, much worse. I was verbally abused by teachers and peers, and it was much, much worse.

      [edit: I retract the sentence "Honestly I'd rather a child touch something hot and learn the lesson that it is unsafe than potentially learn the lesson the people charged with taking care of them are unsafe." It was poorly thought through and poorly worded. To be clear, I do not condone intentionally allowing a child to touch a stove to teach them it is dangerous. I also do not think that the threat of a child touching a stove justifies physically and verbally abusing a child, as OP said.]

      • ShakeThatYam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Letting your child touch something hot (like a stove) to teach them a lesson is in itself physical abuse…