The Cooper Davis Act would force tech companies to report suspected drug activity to the government. Experts say it would be a disaster for digital privacy.

  • 6mementomori@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    97
    arrow-down
    28
    ·
    1 year ago

    it’s never about the drugs, it’s never about the kids, it’s never about the anything

  • markr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fucking Jeanne Shaheen. I’m from NH, I’ve unfortunately had to vote for her repeatedly. She is going to go to her grave an unrepentant drug warrior. I absolutely loathe the Clinton generation of neolib Democrats, they cannot die off fast enough.

  • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’ll just leave this here

    Edit: I misinterpreted - I thought this was focused on ISPs and identifying customers that go to sketchy marketplace sites through inspection of DNS logs. If you’re buying drugs on Facebook market place or something like that and are not expecting to get caught… have fun in prison, I guess? It’s Meta. You don’t have privacy on their products. If you do sketchy shit on any of their platforms, you should expect to get caught.

  • Raphael@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    66
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Combating drugs is good, spying is not good, you need a very transparent law that tackles the issue in a smart way.

    EDIT: Why the downvotes? Is this a pro-drugs community?

    • stanleytweedle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      59
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Simplistic sentiments like ‘combating drugs is good’ is exactly what leads to people to think spying on citizens should even be considered.

      • Raphael@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        49
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        What about pedophilia? Should we also let it go when we give up all investigations on drugs?

        • ElectroNeutrino@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          1 year ago

          So, what specifically makes combating drugs (not specific ones, just drugs in general) good, and how is it comparable to fighting pedophilia? And is it important enough to encroach on individual rights like privacy and due process?

          • Raphael@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            47
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            So, what specifically makes combating drugs good?

            Did your elementary school not teach that drugs are bad? Just asking, I can point you to another number of sources if you want proof.

            and how is it comparable to fighting pedophilia?

            Both are crimes largely committed through the internet.

            And is it important enough to encroach on individual rights like privacy and due process?

            Necessary evil. Go too far in the human rights narrative and society crumbles.

            • ElectroNeutrino@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              19
              ·
              1 year ago

              Did your elementary school not teach that drugs are bad?

              I see, so you think elementary school is valid jurisprudence. This says everything about your ability to form logical conclusions.

              • Raphael@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                30
                ·
                1 year ago

                I see, so you think drugs are good. This says everything about your ability to form logical conclusions.

                • ElectroNeutrino@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  19
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  I see, so you think drugs are good. This says everything about your ability to form logical conclusions.

                  Thank you for demonstrating my point.

                • BoopsieBoop@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I think our government is over stepping their bounds. My body my choice. They aren’t doing this to go after kids. They are doing this to put more bodies in jail. If they cared about the well being of people then they would be making programs or other such things to help people. This proposal to hand over our info is only to hurt us.

            • ???@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              13
              ·
              1 year ago

              Schools say all sorts of stuff, then you grow up and find out it was mostly BS.

            • LemmyNameMyself@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              15
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              drugs are much more complex than “doing them is bad” and banning encrypted messanging apps and implementing surveillance does very little in terms of capturing pedos, while people who use them for legitamate reasons are screwed over

                • stanleytweedle@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  12
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  You also said

                  Necessary evil. Go too far in the human rights narrative and society crumbles.

                  in response to

                  And is it important enough to encroach on individual rights like privacy and due process?

                • LemmyNameMyself@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  You didn’t say it, yes. But established survaillance can be countered by encrypted messanging apps, so the next logical step is to ban them. In fact, the US has been trying to do so for a long time now and the same excuse is always given - “think of the children”. There’s a video by Louis Rossmann and another one by Mental Outlaw, both going into detail about why this is just that, an excuse. Survaillance isn’t normal and should not be normalised.

            • markr@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Perhaps you might consider asking what we ought to do instead of continuing the failed war on drugs?

        • markr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’d point out that this is a classic ‘waddabout the children’ non sequitur, but you already know that.

        • Kitty Jynx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Pedophiles harm other people. Selling drugs that are inspected and tested not to contain additives and are of a set potency would do wonders preventing accidental overdoses. The taxes made off of the legal sale of drugs can be used for education and harm reduction programs.

    • _number8_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 year ago

      combatting drugs is bad. it leads to a black market and unreliable product, resulting in overdoses & deaths

      • Raphael@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        48
        ·
        1 year ago

        A drug addict does not make any contributions to society, he’s the living dead.

        • PeterPoopshit@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Funny how alcohol addicts are allowed to participate in society normally though while no one in any high paying job is allowed to smoke a joint.

          • Raphael@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            27
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Alcohol, cigars and then… cocaine, LSD, crack? Are you honestly making this comparison?

            Could you look someone in the eye and tell that cocaine and tobacco are the same thing?

            • stanleytweedle@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              19
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              The fact that you put LSD between cocaine and crack made me literally lol.

              You’ve clearly lived a very sheltered life and have been fed all of your information on drugs from entertainment media.

              • Raphael@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                17
                ·
                1 year ago

                Maye LSD is “less bad” than the others, fine. I’m not a drug connoisseur.

                • TrontheTechie@infosec.pub
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  12
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  That was obvious when you posted cocaine then crack.

                  It showed that not only are you not a connoisseur, but your understanding of drugs is most likely mainstream fiction and copaganda regurgitated as news.

                  Crack is just cocaine that has been processed so you can smoke it instead of snorting or injecting it.

                  Disclaimer: don’t Fuck around with cocaine, it dumps your dopamine and eventually makes it impossible to feel happiness outside of continued use, and the use diminishes in its dopamine dumps

                  Edit: I didn’t even read the comment two up, they had the same assessment, lol

            • markr@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago
              • alcohol deaths per year: 140,000
              • tobacco deaths per year: 480,000
              • cocaine deaths per year: 15,000 (including crack)
              • opioid deaths per year: 68,000
              • LSD deaths per year: 0
              • cannabis deaths per year: 0

              Our drug war is a fucking farce. It is, and always has been, a fascist culture war.

              • Raphael@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                9
                ·
                1 year ago

                Now we’re talking, I like to see numbers and data. You’re clearly different from the others here.

                Now go a biiit further and check usage statistics for alcohol, cocaine and opioids. Is it the same number of people using all three?

            • Version@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              1 year ago

              I am not saying crack or other drugs are harmless, but man, have you ever seen an alcohol addict? It completely destroys your body, mind and family (which you like to mention when it comes to other drugs). You can absolutely compare it to crack.

              • Raphael@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                1 year ago

                I see, so you’re arguing we must ban both alcohol and drugs? You bring a hard bargain, I’m interested in the connotations of this.

                • Version@feddit.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  This has already been tried and didn‘t work. People consumed it anyway (surprise).

          • Raphael@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            29
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Want to see a video of how someone looks like after using psychedelic drugs for some time? Will you still make this comparison afterwards?

            If you people establish that banning alcohol is a absolute requirement for banning cruel drugs that destroy entire families, so be it.

            EDT: Downvoted in 20 seconds.

            • ???@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Look, you’d have to be both purposefully oblivious and living under a rock to not have a notion of what drunk people look like and the research done on the health risks of it, and all the addiction and alcoholism… Like, give me a fucking break.

              Edit: I’m saying this to say that humans have accepted the risk associates with alcohol (not saying not to regulate it) and it should equally allow the same for drugs. The only difference is that some drugs are plain out less harmful than alcohol.

    • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because the war on drugs was lost before our government (or any government) even started fighting it.

      The DEA is neither necessary or helpful. Legalizing and regulating drugs - and yes, I do mean all drugs - would do far more to improve safety for people who want to, for one reason or another, use drugs (and “drugs” absolutely includes alcohol - it’s a substance that affects your mental state when consumed).

      Or, you know, we could actually correct the root cause, which is wealth inequality, general despair over much of what’s happening in the world these days, and endemic poverty and homelessness. But that wouldn’t be profitable, and supply-side Jesus wouldn’t like that.

    • markr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      It is downvoted because you appear to think that more drug laws are the way to address the opiate addiction public health crisis.

      • Raphael@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        crisis

        Why is it a crisis? I thought you believed drugs were good!! Isn’t it almost an utopic situation with all the opiate addicts around? Is this not what you were looking for?

          • Raphael@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            Oh, are you not a pro-drugs individual? I’m being chased by those who defend drug abuse and a lawless society, sorry if I mistook you for one of the evil-doers.

            • markr@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Eh no, you are repeatedly and dishonestly conflating ‘it’s a public health problem not a criminal justice problem’ with ‘I love all the drugs’. I think I’m done. Arguing with clowns is pointless.

              • Raphael@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                You either defend drugs or you oppose them. Can’t look all hipster and defend strict control at the same time.

    • calabast@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      27
      ·
      1 year ago

      Down votes are because studies have shown that programs like DARE and the “war on drugs” didn’t really make drugs go away, and that we need better solutions that address quality of life and mental health issues to keep people from turning to drugs in the first place. Also, saying we need to “combat” drugs is very adversarial, and reinforces the boogie man of “evil drug users”, which helps the passage of overly powerful laws, and often make it easier to exploit minorities.

      I also think the simplistic “[let’s just] tackle the issue in a smart way” might rub people the wrong way, like “oh, well why didn’t we think of that?”

      EDIT: Your edit of “people don’t agree with me, I guess that means they love drugs” is very assumptive, and close minded.

      • Raphael@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        and that we need better solutions that address quality of life and mental health issues to keep people from turning to drugs in the first place.

        You’re almost there, one more step and you’ll realize the true enemy is capitalism. Some of the weaker drugs can be legalized as long as they’re kept in strict control.

        • stanleytweedle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You’re almost there, one more step and you’ll realize the true enemy is capitalism.

          So there are no black markets outside of capitalist economies?

              • Raphael@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                and that we need better solutions that address quality of life and mental health issues to keep people from turning to drugs in the first place.

                • stanleytweedle@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  You’re almost there, one more step and you’ll realize the true enemy is capitalism.

                  and that we need better solutions that address quality of life and mental health issues to keep people from turning to drugs in the first place.

                  Sounds like you can’t really connect those statements, you just feel like capitalism and drugs are bad so naturally their badness must be connected.