The Cooper Davis Act would force tech companies to report suspected drug activity to the government. Experts say it would be a disaster for digital privacy.

  • LemmyNameMyself@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    drugs are much more complex than “doing them is bad” and banning encrypted messanging apps and implementing surveillance does very little in terms of capturing pedos, while people who use them for legitamate reasons are screwed over

      • stanleytweedle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        You also said

        Necessary evil. Go too far in the human rights narrative and society crumbles.

        in response to

        And is it important enough to encroach on individual rights like privacy and due process?

          • stanleytweedle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Necessary evil. Go too far in the human rights narrative and society crumbles.

            Can’t expect any smart idea from drug addicts though.

            You’re adorable.

            • Raphael@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              1 year ago

              Combating drugs is good, spying is not good, you need a very transparent law that tackles the issue in a smart way.

              • stanleytweedle@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Combating drugs is good, spying is not good, you need a very transparent law that tackles the issue in a smart way.

                Necessary evil. Go too far in the human rights narrative and society crumbles.

                Keep digging ;)

      • LemmyNameMyself@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        You didn’t say it, yes. But established survaillance can be countered by encrypted messanging apps, so the next logical step is to ban them. In fact, the US has been trying to do so for a long time now and the same excuse is always given - “think of the children”. There’s a video by Louis Rossmann and another one by Mental Outlaw, both going into detail about why this is just that, an excuse. Survaillance isn’t normal and should not be normalised.

          • LemmyNameMyself@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            Every country has survaillance, US just makes the most noise with laws being passed. It’s the principle that matters - once other countries see that a certain law allows them to monitor people more closely, they’ll want to pass their version of that law. Australia is basically a Police State, UK also has very privacy-invasive laws.