• lolcatnip@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why would people work for an abusive employer when they don't particularly need to work at all?

    • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because most people want more than basic survival? Having food and a roof over your head come very low on the pyramid of needs.

      • explodicle@local106.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Where does not being abused every day stack up? I'd rather just sit at home than that.

      • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        The whole premise of the argument is that the workers in question are getting paid shit wages, so they're barely getting more than basic survival anyway. So I ask again, why would people put up with that when they could be using that time to look for a new job, learn new skills, become self-employed, etc.? How could giving workers the leverage to quit without the fear of becoming homeless possibly result in them having less leverage over employers than they do now?