Hi. I wanted to know if it's needed to install a firewall on a linux desktop/laptop. Why yes or why no?

  • blarp@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ohhh of course. Thank you.

    So the more practical solution is just to assign a static IP to all my trusted devices, then allow those IP addresses rather than the whole subnet.

    That makes total sense, but why do you think the ArchWiki says otherwise? Do you think they're just presenting a "just werks" solution?

    • Bitrot@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yes, they’re giving “very simplistic” and also demonstrating how to deny and add access in multiple ways.

      It’s also not uncommon to do things like that. The default firewall config in Fedora is wide open for every port above 1024.

      • blarp@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        You are a rock star.

        Okay, I now have new awesome rules! I assigned my other two machines static IPs (192.168.1.3 and 192.168.1.4, respectively). So now I have:

        sudo systemctl enable --now ufw
        sudo ufw default deny
        sudo ufw allow from 192.168.1.3
        sudo ufw allow from 192.168.1.4
        sudo ufw limit ssh
        sudo ufw enable
        

        SSH still works, everything is awesome. Thanks again 👏👏👏

      • Infernal_pizza@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I set up a rule last night to allow SSH access from any device on my subnet, is it a good idea to add a separate rule blocking SSH from my router? I’ve already set up SSH with public key authentication so in theory there aren’t many devices that can access it but the firewall restriction seemed like a good idea

        • Turun@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          If you are worried that an attacker may have compromised your router and that key auth is not secure enough, then yes it would make sense.

          I move ssh to a non-default port, only allow key based auth and install fail2ban. This is enough for me. It protects against automated attacks hitting port 22 and prevents brute force.

          • Infernal_pizza@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I don’t think my router has been compromised and I think it’s pretty unlikely it will be, but the extra rule seems pretty trivial to set up so if there are no downsides I may as well! I have already changed the SSH port and disabled password login. I’ll look into fail2ban, might be worth it if it’s relatively simple to set up!