• richieadler@lemmy.myserv.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    She was also an unabashed atheist, which is why she was able to promote the idea of selfishness being good.

    What the hell is this non-sequitur?

    • Hot Saucerman@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Nearly every religion preaches to be giving and kind to those in need. It's absolutely not a non-sequitor to admit that a large number of atheists don't believe there is any guiding morality to the universe and that we have to come to our own conclusions about morals and ethics. Moral relativism is a generally accepted thing among many atheists. This does not mean all atheists are selfish, I would classify most as Humanists. Rand was mostly an outlier.

      She was able to promote the idea that selfishness could be good because she didn't ascribe to any religion that defined that as a sin.

      • pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I'm not an atheist and even to me, that's a really transparent dig at people who believe something you disagree with. You don't need religion to be altruistic as you are implying.

          • Hot Saucerman@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            I'm a fucking atheist and I think Ayn Rand was a loser sack of shit who leaned on every government assistance she preached against existing.

            So yeah, Rand was riding on it. I would like to think most fellow atheists reject her power-worship bullshit wrapped in "Objectivism."