• Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yes, it must be you. If I had meant it to be exclusive, I would have said "that is not solely due to autism, that is solely due to the way society treats autistic people"

    But please, continue to berate me for not having the evidence I admit I don't have. I'm sure that will lead to productive discussion.

    • Lols [they/them]@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      i doubt there was any chance of a productive discussion past ‘well thats wrong, heres whats actually happening’ with 0 evidence and maintaining that it just has to be true when challenged

      im doing this so folks reading this thread at least get the added context of the above being a complete unsourced guess

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yep, there it is.

        "I have no evidence."

        "You idiot! You have no evidence!"

        "I know. I said I have no evidence."

        "What kind of fool says that sort of thing without evidence?"

        "Me, I guess."

        "Ha! I knew you had no evidence!"

        Is this going to continue ad nauseam or do you have a point besides the fact that I said something I don't have evidence for? Because I think the folks reading this thread might have glommed on to the fact that I have no evidence at this point.