Highlight:

“I have ordered a complete siege on the Gaza Strip. There will be no electricity, no food, no water, no fuel, everything is closed,” Gallant said. “We are fighting human animals and we are acting accordingly.”

  • Iceblade@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Is the intent to starve civilians or to deprive hamas combatants of any and all supplies?

    • Neshura@bookwormstory.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you are blocking an entire region from getting food and water then yes, the intent is to starve the civilian population.

      • Iceblade@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Regardless of what we feel is intended or not, that is what war is - hell for everybody involved. Let's just hope that this doesn't get drawn out.

      • SCB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        That's not what "intent to starve a civilian population" means. This is not a program of starvation. It's cutting off resources before an invasion

        This isn't your homebrew DnD game where you can make rules mean whatever you want.

        • Neshura@bookwormstory.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          This is not a program of starvation

          It is though. A program of cutting off resources would be blocking fuel and other goods, not fucking food and water. Ukraine was rightfully put in the corner for cutting off water to Crimea after 2014. There is no excuse to starving people, it's a horrendous crime which should land the people involved in prison. Besides what do you think will happen now? Who will the Palestinians in Gaza trust more, the murder hobos who got them into this mess or the Israelis who decided collective punishment is an appropriate response? War crimes are called war crimes for a reason, just because one side commits them doesn''t suddenly make it ok to commit them back.

          • SCB@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            It isn't, and whoever told you it is such is just lying to you.

            Idk where you people get your "news" but whatever podcasters you listen to are fucking braindead.

            You're exactly equivalent to the dumbest of the MAGA by believing that tripe.