Highlight:

“I have ordered a complete siege on the Gaza Strip. There will be no electricity, no food, no water, no fuel, everything is closed,” Gallant said. “We are fighting human animals and we are acting accordingly.”

  • newDayRocks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well since Hamas has already executed civilians, and Israel has both the military advantage and support of world leaders, they are not exactly negotiating from a position of strength.

    • ???@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don't think your plan would even remotely lead to a joint country solution, more like Israel just wins.

      • newDayRocks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I didn't suggest any plan leading to a joint county solution.

        You know what would not even remotely lead to such a solution? Kidnapping and murdering civilians.

        Just so we're clear, everyone loses here. But Israel is not going to negotiate with terrorists, nor should they.

        • ???@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Ah sorry I mixed up the threads. In another one, I was asking people what they would do if they were Hamas to reach a joint state solution. My bad.

          You know what would not even remotely lead to such a solution? Kidnapping and murdering civilians.

          I agree. Hamas are dumb as fuck.

          Just so we’re clear, everyone loses here. But Israel is not going to negotiate with terrorists, nor should they.

          And Israel won't care about civilian lives either. Not wanting to negotiate with terrorists doesn't mean all those kids in Gaza had to die. This is not what "not negotiating with terrorists" looks like. What it looks like is wanting to ethnically cleanse Palestinians.

          In your example above, Israel takes all while Palestinians just get "prisoners" back (prisoners that are not really being tried for anything, a literal war crime, so for all intents and purposes they are not detained under any reasonable law and they don't have the most basic of rights)… and Palestine gets nothing.

          Seems to me like maybe Israel should negotiate with terrorists if it means less dead civilians. But Israel doesn't care about that. And this is why we are here today.

          • newDayRocks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            In your example above, Israel takes all while Palestinians just get "prisoners" back (prisoners that are not really being tried for anything, a literal war crime, so for all intents and purposes they are not detained under any reasonable law and they don't have the most basic of rights)… and Palestine gets nothing.

            Palestine also get the benefit of not having their cities ravaged while Israel troops hunt down enemy combatants. They get to keep some semblance of an autonomous nation. They also minimize civilian casualties in their end, if they actually cared about that.

            Seems to me like maybe Israel should negotiate with terrorists if it means less dead civilians. But Israel doesn't care about that. And this is why we are here today.

            It's very hard to make the argument that Israel should care about less dead civilians when the other side specifically targets civilians. I'm not sure why you keep expecting Israel to negotiate with restraint when they have no incentive to negotiate at all.

            What will happen if Israel does not come to the table? Hamas will kill innocent people? And if Israel negotiates and comes to peace with Hamas, the killing will stop? History shows otherwise.

            And since that killing innocent part already happens, there's nothing left to bargain for is there?

            I also take issue with the fact that bringing accountability to Hamas for what happened is considered one sided negotiations for Israel. How is justice for a terrorist act considered a total victory?

            • ???@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Palestine also get the benefit of not having their cities ravaged while Israel troops hunt down enemy combatants.

              This should never be a "benefit" nor is it a "benefit" to any other group of people.

              They get to keep some semblance of an autonomous nation.

              Yeah just a "fake" self determination, never a real fulfilling one.

              hey also minimize civilian casualties in their end, if they actually cared about that.

              If they actually cared about that? What is that supposed to mean? Sounds to me like you are making shitty generalizations about Palestinians.

              I’m not sure why you keep expecting Israel to negotiate with restraint when they have no incentive to negotiate at all. I don't expect them to. I have no hope at all that the current Israeli government will stop committing war crimes.

              • newDayRocks@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                This should never be a "benefit" nor is it a "benefit" to any other group of people.

                Then don't harbor terrorists. It obviously wasn't a "benefit" to the Israelis who were murdered now was it?

                If they actually cared about that? What is that supposed to mean? Sounds to me like you are making shitty generalizations about Palestinians.

                If Hamas cared about civilian casualties, they would never have kidnapped and executed civilians. If they cared about civilian casualties, they would negotiate their surrender.

                If you're trying to spotlight Israel's treatment of Palestinians and hoping to garner sympathy, you're not going to have much success when the current world event topic is "Palestinians (Hamas) murdered and taken hostage innocent Israeli civilians."

                • ???@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  You're right in your last statement. The world has already ignored Palestinian suffering and the result now is an ongoing ethnic cleansing of Palestinians. Nope, no one would sanction Israel or do anything and here we are today.

                  • newDayRocks@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Ignoring the false statements you are making. If you want the world to support you, don't commit acts of terror on civilians.