For me personally this feels very wrong. What do you think about that?

  • pivot_root@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Final keywords–like locks on a door–are just a suggestion. If someone wants to light a stick of dynamite and play hot potato with it, that's their own problem. As long as they aren't wasting upstream dev's time or publishing packages that depend on this to work, it's not worth getting upset about.

    • Alex@programming.devOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      As long as they aren't wasting upstream dev's time or publishing packages that depend on this to work

      But exactly this will happen.

  • dbx12@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Just because one person said "final is bad", the Laravel fanboy herd is flocking to solutions like this. In my opinion, the package per se is not bad, but the unreflected, absolute statement "final is bad" is the problem.

    • Alex@programming.devOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      In my opinion, the package itself is bad. It suggests by its very existence that final is bad. It tempts to use dependencies in a way that was not intended by their developers.

      • TheCee@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        This. And, unlike Lombok, there is no -deUnfinalize. Sure seems like youre stuck with fixing your codebase, when this thing finally folds.