You must log in or # to comment.
Seems straightforward to me. It's pretty typical to permit testimony from those who were directly victimized. It's also pretty typical to permit impact statements from those indirectly victimized.
Exactly what I was thinking. This just sounds like it would be a victim impact statement which serves very standard.
I also fail to see how it could possibly be considered irrelevant.
But your honour it would be devastating to our case!
I think it would depend on what they're trying to charge him with.
Clowvnoy organizers fucked around and now don't want to find out. FTFY
lock them up!
I love when people who apparently work as writers get stuff like if/whether wrong.
Okay, I don't: they should know better.
