Australians have resoundingly rejected a proposal to recognise Aboriginal people in its constitution and establish a body to advise parliament on Indigenous issues.

Saturday’s voice to parliament referendum failed, with the defeat clear shortly after polls closed.

  • Affidavit@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It's clear that most of the people responding to you are being deceptive and crying 'racism' to make themselves feel superior.

    This was not a referendum to recognise indigenous people. Whomever titled this article is a liar. It was a referendum to create an advisory body that makes representations to parliament to support a specific race. Contrary to the holier-than-thou crowd around here, many people voted 'No' because they do not agree with permanently enshrining this in the Constitution.

      • TrippaSnippa@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I never saw any arguments against the Voice that weren't either simplistic ideology ("it's racist to have an advisory body for indigenous people!") or outright lies and conspiracy theories. Claiming that it wouldn't have gone far enough isn't a good argument to do nothing instead. Does anyone really think that a treaty is more likely now than if we had voted yes?

        • ⸻ Ban DHMO 🇦🇺 ⸻@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well technically a treaty doesn't need a referendum but given the strong no result it could be political suicide, a risk I hope the Albanese government is willing to take