• Neato@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why would you want cloud storage to have an uneditable, append-only storage medium?

    • Nougat@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It's not uneditable, append-only. Backups, log storage, large file media storage and streaming. It's competing with Amazon S3, not Dropbox.

      • Neato@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        A blockchain is a distributed ledger with growing lists of records (blocks) that are securely linked together via cryptographic hashes.[1][2][3][4] Each block contains a cryptographic hash of the previous block, a timestamp, and transaction data (generally represented as a Merkle tree, where data nodes are represented by leaves). Since each block contains information about the previous block, they effectively form a chain (compare linked list data structure), with each additional block linking to the ones before it. Consequently, blockchain transactions are irreversible in that, once they are recorded, the data in any given block cannot be altered retroactively without altering all subsequent blocks.

        Yes they are. If you need an uneditable log, I guess? There are no uses on the blockchain for large file storage. Zero. It's a ledger, not a storage medium.

        It's competing with Amazon S3, not Dropbox.

        Distributed cloud storage sounds more like old torrents with partial seeders. But if you're using a chained ledger for that, sure. But like crypto, it's going to balloon out of control.

        • Nougat@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          The storage isn't on a blockchain. The tokens are just used to compensate node operators based on storage usage, ingress, egress, repair.