SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoGrayjay: A new app that merges different video platforms into onewww.youtube.comexternal-linkmessage-square68fedilinkarrow-up1266arrow-down139file-textcross-posted to: videos@lemmy.mlvideos@lemmy.world
arrow-up1227arrow-down1external-linkGrayjay: A new app that merges different video platforms into onewww.youtube.comSkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square68fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: videos@lemmy.mlvideos@lemmy.world
minus-square👍Maximum Derek👍@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up20arrow-down4·edit-21 year agoIts open source code and Louis Rossman has a big following. If it ever gets anything malicious put in it the world will know quickly.
minus-squareRobotToaster@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11arrow-down6·1 year agoIt isn't open source, the licence violates point six of the open source definition
minus-squareSkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.deOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15arrow-down8·1 year agoit's open source, just not Open Source
minus-squarebionicjoey@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10arrow-down7·1 year agoIt is open source. And it is free as in beer. It's not free as in speech though. But I understand his reasons and they are justifiable IMO given the android ecosystem.
minus-squareInfiniWheel@lemmy.onelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10arrow-down1·1 year agoFrom my limited understanding, open source means a very specific thing. So this is just "source available".
minus-squareHerowyn@jlai.lulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·1 year agoYeah “Open source” can be many things and the definition is often misused. I would say it’s FOSS without being FLOSS. As you say “source available”.
minus-squareUsernameblankface@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoAre we talking about Grayjay from the video or the link in the comment I replied to?
Its open
sourcecode and Louis Rossman has a big following. If it ever gets anything malicious put in it the world will know quickly.It isn't open source, the licence violates point six of the open source definition
it's open source, just not Open Source
It is open source. And it is free as in beer. It's not free as in speech though. But I understand his reasons and they are justifiable IMO given the android ecosystem.
From my limited understanding, open source means a very specific thing. So this is just "source available".
Yeah “Open source” can be many things and the definition is often misused. I would say it’s FOSS without being FLOSS. As you say “source available”.
Are we talking about Grayjay from the video or the link in the comment I replied to?