• blitzkrieg@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    Lies like the 40 beheaded babies that the entire western media spread?

    Israel literally kills journalists.

    • 5BC2E7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      31
      ·
      1 year ago

      If whatabautism about the other side propaganda is your best response to defend their journalistic integrity I don’t think you have an argument

      • blitzkrieg@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Israel didn’t just ban Al Jazeera, they also killed their reporter, Shireen Abu Akleh.

        Have you condemned them for killing her?

        Israel is out there killing reporters (which is a war crime), and you guys here are talking about biased media?

    • V17@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      26
      ·
      1 year ago

      Lies like the 40 beheaded babies that the entire western media spread?

      “Lies” in this case means “reported on claims made by actual Israeli soldiers without sufficient cross-checking, but explicitly walked back pretty much immediately”, plus there are non-Israeli sources (at least one french journalist-editor and czech ambassador) who specifically say that they were shown the actual photos of beheaded babies and cross-checked them (the number 40 seems to be bullshit, but iirc most media did not report that and these people did not claim that either).

      Next to that is Al Jazeera whose purpose for existing is to spread Qatari world of view by reporting relatively objectively on most things to gain trust and spreading pure propaganda on issues like most things related to Israel.

      It really isn’t all that similar.

      • WalrusDragonOnABike@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        So random rumors spread by soldiers should be treated as truth (because its pro-team Israel ) but reporting on what the ministry of health of gaza, officials in israel, and random israel soldiers all confirm is spreading baseless lies (because it is anti-team Israel)?

        No denying AJ doesn’t spread propaganda. But if Israel wants to stop propganda, maybe they should start by getting rid of their officials and soldiers, who are spreading the rumors in the first place?

        • V17@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          So random rumors spread by soldiers should be treated as truth (because its pro-team Israel )

          I thought that my quote on what happened in that case pretty clearly implied that it was a screw-up. Nevertheless, it was a relatively short-lived screw up which, unlike the claims of 500 killed by a supposed Israeli strike on a hospital, didn’t seem to do any damage apart from slightly lessening the trustworthiness of media or Israel for some people.

          reporting on what the ministry of health of gaza, officials in israel, and random israel soldiers all confirm

          If you’re talking about the hospital strike, I haven’t seen anyone but the ministry of health of Gaza say what they said, and the ministry of health of Gaza is de facto Hamas. I do see Hamas, a terrorist organization, as implicitly less trustworthy than IDF, even though I don’t trust everything IDF says, yes.

          • blitzkrieg@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah man, nothing happened except succeeding in dehumanizing Palestinians and Muslims, which resulted in a man in the US to stab a Palestinian woman, and kill her 6 year old son by stabbing him 26 times with a 7 inch knife while screaming “ALL MUSLIMS MUST DIE”.

            Nothing important really.

          • WalrusDragonOnABike@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            So you didn’t even bother looking at the sources for the claim you make fun of?

            Given members of the IDF have supported the idea that it was an intentional attract to get Hamas hiding in the hospital from the moment it happened, why don’t you believe the IDF members and Hamas when they agree that it was an Israeli attack? I don’t even believe it was an Israeli attack* and this incident just further demonstrates the IDF members and Israeli officials will just make up stuff to bolster their side even when they have no actual information. There’s no reason to believe either side imo.

            *The worst case is Israel defended themselves against a missile and the payload from the middle happened to fall on a hospital because a terrorist group was too incompetent to make sure that a hospital wasn’t directly under the trajectory. I don’t think someone having an incoming missile has any obligation to first check what happens to be under the missile at the time before destroying said missile, so it’s still doesn’t make Israel look bad imo like some people are claiming.

        • V17@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          People are still spreading the beheaded baby horseshit

          Honestly, the only context in which I see it is people complaining about it being a lie, but that may just be that we have different internet bubbles.

          Personally I don’t call it horseshit because several people that I consider trustworthy confirmed being shown photos of beheaded babies (though not 40 of them, but I’ve never even seen that claim anywhere, I’ve seen a separate early claim that 40 babies were killed in total, not specifically beheaded) by Israeli officials, one of them being our ambassador, who so far has been a completely trustworthy person as far as I know. We also do know that Israelis only showed some photos privately to selected foreign politicians, journalists and diplomats, because (apart from them saying so) the people shown described those photos and they were later released publicly. It is not inconceivable that the beheaded babies were among those not released to public for some reason.

          It’s a basic propaganda technique. You, to great fanfare, release some big fuckoff lie that makes the “other” look bad (“V17 FUCKS GOATS! V17 IS A GOATFUCKER, EVERYONE!”) and then days or weeks later you follow up with the truth to head off any claims that you couldn’t possibly be a REAL journalist (“Our apologies, it seems V17 was only washing his car. There was no goat. He did not fuck the car.”) but you do so in as quiet and half-assed of a manner as possible.

          The issue is that is not what happened. Apart from what I say above, the fact that white house representatives pretty much immediately walked back on that was widely reported by mainstream media a day later. Also, the attack was already so brutal that it changed nothing about how Hamas is being perceived. For most people, slaughtered civilians with marks of torture and burned babies (those were afaik released on photos, but I did not want to look to check) were unsurprisingly enough.

          Compare that to a failed rocket of palestinian islamic jihad falling on a hospital parking lot, Hamas knowingly lying about it according to a released wiretap and people still arguing that Israel did it in similar threads on Lemmy.

          Also I’ll have you know that I fuck sheep, not goats.

          • blitzkrieg@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            So, why don’t they show these pictures to the world?

            Also

            Personally I don’t call it horseshit because several people that I consider trustworthy confirmed being shown photos of beheaded babies (though not 40 of them, but I’ve never even seen that claim anywhere, I’ve seen a separate early claim that 40 babies were killed in total, not specifically beheaded) by Israeli officials, one of them being our ambassador

            Do you by any chance happen to have believed the US lies about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, which the US lied about to invade Iraq, and killed hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians?

            • V17@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              So, why don’t they show these pictures to the world?

              Decency? I don’t know that of course, I’m not saying that I’m sure about this, but not releasing photos of people that are too undignified or drastic is a relatively common policy.

              Do you by any chance happen to have believed the US lies about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, which the US lied about to invade Iraq, and killed hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians?

              I’m not from the US and I was not yet following US/international politics at that time. Also none of the people I talked about were americans (“our” ambassador being czech, a journalist-editor from France also confirmed seeing the photos), so I don’t see it as particularly relevant anyway.

              • blitzkrieg@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Oh, so Israel has images proving that Hamas beheaded babies, which is like, literally the worst thing in the world, but they just decided not to release to show the world for some reason, and you genuinely believe that? You just can’t sense something weird in that at all?

                • V17@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  By how much is it worse than burned babies, which were released?

                  Plus, notice that I said it’s plausible, not that I believe one version or the other. And, again, even if we say that it was a lie and therefora a fuck up and journos did not sufficiently crosscheck the validity and several people who claim to have seen the photos are lying even if it could cost their careers, in the light of the colossal fuckup with the hospital parking lot bombing that endangered diplomatic ties with several countries and started protests in the streets of several countries, this was relatively minor and pretty well handled.

                  • blitzkrieg@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    No, spreading lies about Hamas beheading babies to dehumanize Palestinians and justify the war crimes Israel is committing against them is not “relatively minor and pretty well handled”.

      • themoonisacheese@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        What’s more likely?

        That a news outlet appears totally committed to the most objective possible view on any issue ever except for exactly this.

        Or

        Maybe you might be wrong sometimes as humans are not infallible.

        • V17@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Both are entirely possible, even at once. Also it’s not just “exactly this”, it’s generally a broader range of topics. And, to nitpick a bit, “relatively objectively” is not the same as “totally committed to the most objective possible view”.

          For another example of the former, as the guy below you says, years ago this was the exact modus operandi of (the english version of) Russia Today, until it reoriented and started targeting straight up pro-russian conspiracy nuts. Sputnik I think was always a bit out there, but I’m honestly not sure.

      • blitzkrieg@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah man, nothing happened except succeeding in dehumanizing Palestinians and Muslims, which resulted in a man in the US to stab a Palestinian woman, and kill her 6 year old son by stabbing him 26 times with a 7 inch knife while screaming “ALL MUSLIMS MUST DIE”.

        Nothing important really.