• Makeitstop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      163
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I would assume that they retain the data and are just hiding it from public view. That way they can fulfill one of their organizational goals, trying to prevent useful or accurate information from reaching the public, but still have the ability to respond to a subpoena.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I used to work for a company with a product for putting a legal hold on people’s accounts. It archived the data off to a safe place, with a signature so you can tell it wasn’t tampered with. By default, it kept things six months, but as soon as it ran, you’re free to delete the public copy

    • cricket97@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Every social media for as long as I can remember removes the profiles of mass shooters. Youtube does it, twitter used to do it, facebook does it, etc. Do you really think the fbi wouldn’t be able to get the data because an account was removed from the platform? use your brain people

      • magnetosphere@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I know it’s absurd. Even if I had proof of something illegal, I have zero authority to do anything about it. I’m just venting because I’m annoyed, and I’m sick of Musk’s constant bullshit.

      • Jomega@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It helps establish a motive for the killer, which is very important in a court of law. Knowing why someone did something affects sentencing, for example.

        • jarfil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Wonder how many illiterate people know the word “illiterate”… 🤔

          • Gabu@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Here’s a fun read for you: functional illiteracy. It’s the phenomenon whereby a person is capable of “reading”, as in sounding out words, but functionally incapable of extracting meaning from them beyond the painfully obvious.

            • jarfil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I have the opposite happen to me with Chinese, like I know 危高电压 means “danger high electric pressure (voltage)”, but have no idea how to sound it out. Dysfunctional literacy? 😄

              • Gabu@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Haha, I think that’s usually just called “learning a language from books”. My magyar (Hungarian) suffers from a similar issue.