Asking for a friend.

  • folkrav@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’m not sure I understand. I’m speaking specifically about this particular situation you mentioned : what’s the difference in terms of legitimacy between the two kills, if both were made to be sold to feed someone else?

    I understand the legal aspect, like endangered species protections, etc, but that’s another topic entirely. Or is it actually not and you actually meant “legality”?

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The point would be it was killed for unrelated reasons, and then is made available post-mortem for consumption somehow. And verifiably so!

      As for the ethics:

      Eating endangered animals is generally agreed to be a dick move.

      I feel like that sums it up pretty well. I don’t know OP but I’d bet money that they would agree it’s to be avoided, so that’s the light I answered the question in.

      If this is a vegetarian thing, I did make a mention of that in my OP. Dispensing a lecture instead of answering the spirit of the question would have been unhelpful.