• No it does not. It could be hamfisted into being an std but you can’t cure aids by setting up a zany swimming pool trap or fucking it away.

    Its a dumb monster movie with sex sloppily laid on top. So sloppily that one could reasonably conclude it’s pointlessly gratuitous.

    • usernamesaredifficul [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      1 year ago

      no that’s really silly the monsters in a movie can at once be metaphors and also literal monsters within the narrative in dracula the vampire both represents a horror from the old world come into the new and a scary dude that eats people

      it’s called a story having themes

      • RION [she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Guy looking at dracula: damn an empire teetering at the apex of its power is anxious about the horrors of colonialism being turned inward, and the hidden debauchery that undergirds a puritanical society!

        The true point arcing above his head: damn eastern Europeans are weird

      • Yeah it follows has one theme executed poorly. It has one metaphor also executed poorly. Its a facil movie and a typical monster movie shot in a somewhat art house style. I really think its the style that makes people see a depth that is just not present.

        • usernamesaredifficul [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          no it doesn’t only have one theme we’re just only talking about one of the themes right now. Alcoholism and addiction are also themes of the movie for example

          and your idea of the metaphor being executed poorly seems to be that the film also treats the in narrative real monster as a real monster as well as a metaphor

            • Just because you didn’t understand it doesn’t mean that its bad. Just because it wasn’t made for $20 by a bunch of film students doesn’t make it soulless. You not liking it is fine but you’re not the arbiter of taste

              • I understand it fine.

                Let’s say it is about the consequences of sex. What are those exactly. Pregnancy, loss of financial opportunity, loss of autonomy, STDs, a lasting responsiblty , all of these things could have been explored in fun and intrestimg ways but, what did we get? A by the numbers monster movie with a somewhat novel twist. Like

                • GriffithDidNothingWrong [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  18
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Another of the consequences of sex for a young woman is that peoples attitudes about you may change, even people close to you. Most notably embodied by her simp friend who still wants to have sex with her and is jealous of those that do, despite knowing it means his death, and who is ultimately disillusioned when they do because its meaningless and perfunctory for both of them.

                  The movie chose to convey this in the form of an unstoppable monster that posseses people because its a monster movie. Again, you don’t have to like it. Not every movie appeals to every person but its not like we’re talking about Halloween 3 here. A lot of people like that movie for a reason

                  • zed_proclaimer [he/him]@hexbear.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    14
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    I would also say the “it” that follows, the monster, is an embodiment of contradictory social pressures that follows women in the contemporary world. The pressure by men to have sex (and the rewards that come when you give in to that pressure) vs. the opposing social force condemning you for being a sl*t, saying you are just sleeping your way up catching up to you. This is represented by the chain of sex, it both damns and then saves you. The first person you fuck damns you (you lose your virginity) and the second person you fuck saves you, but at the expense of you damning them. They become the “sl-t” that society chases instead, the lowest rung in the totem pole.

                    I think it’s a quite poignant and thoughtful criticism and exploration and has a lot more nuance than the user above gives credit for.

                  • The movie chose to convey this in the form of an unstoppable monster that posseses people because its a monster movie.

                    The movie conveys this as events in the movie. The monster is independent of this and poorly represents or stands in for anything deeper than antagonist. The movie is fine I don’t dislike it but it is so overhyped.