- cross-posted to:
- news@kbin.social
- cross-posted to:
- news@kbin.social
The attacks claimed the lives of an Indiana woman and an Oregon man, both cisgender people.
The attacks claimed the lives of an Indiana woman and an Oregon man, both cisgender people.
Well my point is: “there is too much fad/buzzword/“engagement” out there of that concept, that googling/searching/… for all the terms that appear in headlines is a waste of time.” This is my non-troll, serious argument.
It’s not a “buzzword,” It’s been in use since the mid 90s. Just because it’s new to you doesn’t mean it’s a “fad.”
And I’m truly sorry your Google-fu is that weak. But here.
I Coined The Term ‘Cisgender’ 29 Years Ago. Here’s What This Controversial Word Really Means.
Sure. And googling about that climate change hoax is waste of time as well, there’s too much leftist propaganda there. Or stuff about some_group’s human rights, these people feel iffy and I don’t want to drive engagement discussing them. Or lets slash women’s healthcare because I have my Bible here and there’s nothing else I need to know. Earth is flat too btw, why do I need to google what some NASA shill says, it’s all CGI anyway.
It’s a hyperbole and it should not sound reasonable, but this is what this type of thought process leads to. If you think your topics of choice are immune, you’re kinda missing the whole point of this conversation.