• iridaniotter [she/her]@hexbear.netOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 year ago

    Vegans will say that artificial insemination in animal agriculture is simply socially acceptable bestiality (someone in the comments is doing just that). Carnists then respond that it’s not bestiality because it is done for delayed, abstracted pleasure rather than immediate, sexual pleasure. Bruh, it’s still sexual assault regardless of your hair-splitting. 💀

    • aaaaaaadjsf [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Most people in animal husbandry would argue that artificial insemination is better for the health of the animals involved, for both the cow and the bull. Animals don’t really follow the concept of consent, and the cow or bull could get seriously injured, or worse, otherwise.

      Though the argument could easily be made that it would be better not to breed cows at all, and that would be the best health outcome.

      • Are_Euclidding_Me [e/em/eir]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, as a vegan, my stance is we should stop breeding cows.

        By the way, I’ve heard the argument “oh, it’s better for the health of the animal to do … whatever” in quite a few contexts that I think are just plain wrong. Such as, for example, farrowing crates. Apparently it’s “better” for the sow and her babies if she is stuck in a crate so small she can’t even turn around. I don’t buy that farrowing crates are good for pigs and I don’t buy that artificial insemination is good for cows either.