• booty [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    uhhhh that’s just (unfortunately) very well-documented to be false. like, extremely well documented.

    edit: also that’s an incomprehensible answer to the question. why would something being impossible make it wrong? I don’t think it would be morally wrong to sidestep through the 8th dimension to get to work faster

    • Dolores [love/loves]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      i guarantee someone would have a moral stance against teleportation if it existed. but it doesn’t so i don’t very much care to speculate.

      but handfuls of unverified and whispered-about videos doesn’t constitute ‘extreme’ documentation, i’d welcome an actual study proving there’s more than dozens of actual bestia–uh–tists? and a widespread occurrence of the act, but i know of no such studies and no opinions on it that aren’t painted by the cultural baggage attached

      it’s akin to people wingsuit flying through a suspension bridge and getting cheese-grated, there’s certainly footage of it and it was a bad idea but i don’t think it’s a very pressing concern for most people

      • booty [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        so, bestiality is wrong because you can’t do it, in other words it’s impossible. therefore the people who have done it on video are evil because they’re doing something impossible. huey-wut

        • Dolores [love/loves]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          my op was 99.99%, that is not absolute, i was never making an absolute rule, my claim is that discourses about bestiality are mostly talking about the imaginary and fetishes but failing to recognize that. the article/tweet we’re talking about is a thinly disguised sexual fantasy with no interface with material reality. and people itt are conflating that with the extraordinarily rare real world acts, that are nothing like that sexual fantasy.

          in the ‘article’ they’re imagining a consensual sexual relationship with a dog, which the dog consents to. this is impossible not just from a dog’s faculty to consent, but because dogs do not experience sexual attraction to humans. if a male dog has ever fucked people, which i seriously doubt, it’d be through transparently nonconsensual training or something. it’s not a real argument or a real situation, and i think it’s silly when people give it the airs of a moral debate

          • booty [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            22
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            if a male dog has ever fucked people, which i seriously doubt

            ok, so you’re just talking from a position of ignorance. when i say this is extremely well-documented, i mean that there used to be a subreddit called /r/sexwithdogs where people were posting hundreds of videos of precisely this.

            it’d be through transparently nonconsensual training or something

            this is true, yeah, you have to groom animals for stuff like this, just like any other vulnerable party.

          • BeamBrain [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            if a male dog has ever fucked people, which i seriously doubt, it’d be through transparently nonconsensual training or something.

            When I was growing up, we had a family dog that was constantly humping legs. This isn’t a defense, mind, since “but they made the first move” isn’t any more justifiable with animals than it is with children, but it does happen.

            • Dolores [love/loves]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              i think it’s a long way from leg-hump (which isn’t sexual in all situations, it’s often about dominance) to fucking an animal with incompatible morphology, wrong pheromones, and incorrect behavior