• onlinepersona@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    If it has secure boot, is opensource, and not dependent on having a single entity approve of self compiled binaries OE blobs (like UEFI forcing Microsoft’s approval of bootloaders), then heck yeah, this might be great! Otherwise, if it’s just some proprietary, closed source alternative to the existing crap, my enthusiasm is limited.

    • varyingExpertise@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      UEFI doesn’t have anything to do with MS. I have deployed desktops at scale with custom CAs for SecureBoot and the Microsoft keys removed on standard off the shelf x86 hardware.

    • Alphane Moon@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      The machine translated version of the Fast Technology/mydrivers article does not mention any of this.

        • fonix232@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Disappointing but not unexpected. Most Chinese companies still work on the “absolute secrecy because competitors might steal our tech” ideology. Which hinders a lot of things…

            • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              If I managed to get root, either by compromising account credentials or using some sort of escalation exploit, I could write whatever I wanted to the boot sector. Secure boot will prevent that modified boot sector from booting.

              “More security is a bad thing” is a weird take