BrikoX@vlemmy.net to World News@beehaw.orgEnglish · edit-21 year agoApple Is Taking On Apples in a Truly Weird Trademark Battlearchive.phexternal-linkmessage-square21fedilinkarrow-up138arrow-down10cross-posted to: apple@lemmy.mlapple_enthusiast@lemmy.worldworld@lemmy.world
arrow-up138arrow-down1external-linkApple Is Taking On Apples in a Truly Weird Trademark Battlearchive.phBrikoX@vlemmy.net to World News@beehaw.orgEnglish · edit-21 year agomessage-square21fedilinkcross-posted to: apple@lemmy.mlapple_enthusiast@lemmy.worldworld@lemmy.world
minus-squareStorksforlegs@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·edit-21 year agoI always thought the purpose of advertising trademark IP was to prevent consumer confusion? In this case that would be what exactly? Hopefully the courts will strike in the farmers’ favour, I mean they have been around longer. It would be fun if the apple growers won and were able to countersue apple for using their hundred year old trademark.
I always thought the purpose of advertising trademark IP was to prevent consumer confusion? In this case that would be what exactly?
Hopefully the courts will strike in the farmers’ favour, I mean they have been around longer.
It would be fun if the apple growers won and were able to countersue apple for using their hundred year old trademark.