saarin@alien.topB to Emacs@communick.newsEnglish · 1 year agoIs the lack of multithreading support in emacs a dealbreaker for you?message-squaremessage-square45fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up11arrow-down1message-squareIs the lack of multithreading support in emacs a dealbreaker for you?saarin@alien.topB to Emacs@communick.newsEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square45fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareAIDS-RAT@alien.topBlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoIt might not be a dealbreaker for me per say, but it’s absolutely something that should be included one day.
minus-squarepeterhoeg@alien.topBlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoOut of curiosity - what are your use-cases where the lack of multi-threading is an issue?
minus-squarenv-elisp@alien.topBlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoNo detail in your response. How would Tramp benefit from multithreading in any way that isn’t achievable already with an asynchronous approach?
minus-squareterminal_prognosis@alien.topBlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoAre you sure the problem there is threading? I’m pretty sure it is not. There’s very little CPU usage. The problem is TRAMP is written synchronously when it should be asynchronous, not that it doesn’t have threads.
It might not be a dealbreaker for me per say, but it’s absolutely something that should be included one day.
Out of curiosity - what are your use-cases where the lack of multi-threading is an issue?
Tramp
No detail in your response. How would Tramp benefit from multithreading in any way that isn’t achievable already with an asynchronous approach?
Are you sure the problem there is threading? I’m pretty sure it is not. There’s very little CPU usage. The problem is TRAMP is written synchronously when it should be asynchronous, not that it doesn’t have threads.