• OwenEverbinde@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Someone else here mentioned that being an LGBTQ+ instance and allowing association with porn occasionally described as “childlike” isn’t something Blahaj can afford in this political climate.

    They’re already being called child groomers. You don’t want something that can be twisted into ammunition by bad actors.

    • krayj@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Since I don’t associate LGBTQ+ with child-grooming, that notion never occurred to me. But now that you mention it, and knowing the current sad state of the current political climate, that point sounds entirely plausible. Thank you for pointing that out.