• sartalon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I don’t disagree with your sentiment.

    I think it is bad enough though, without the news source twisting it for sensationalism.

    *Edit. Hmm, I guess you people are ok with lies as long as they support the narrative you want. Is this suddenly a GoP sub?

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Gotcha. Hey, how much oil has to be objectively confirmed to 7 significant figures before You’re concerned? How much is okay for you?

      • sartalon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Any.

        Doesn’t mean I’m going to lie about the amount to get clicks.

        Let me ask you a similar question.

        How much of a lie does it need to be before you are willing to call it a lie?

    • TwoGems@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      So you’re concerned with how much oil leaked? Does it matter? This shouldn’t be happening.