• ricecake@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    A company giving special access to it’s competition on a platform they control is usually used as an indicator of not being anticompetitive.

    I hadn’t considered it from a “collusion” angle.

      • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Eh, when Microsoft was required to ask you which browser you wanted, they didn’t need to offer every browser, just theirs, firefox and Chrome.

        This could definitely be collusion, but I don’t think that not extending it to all competitiors is what makes it that.