Tuberville failed to mention that he’s personally prevented hundreds of officers from being promoted because he disagrees with a 2022 Pentagon policy.

  • aidan@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    11 months ago

    the statement was encouraging a voting position

    the phrasing didn’t indicate that. “Should never win an election” would be much more clear than “should not be allowed” which implies prohibition.

    • abbotsbury@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      the phrasing didn’t indicate that

      the phrasing certainly didn’t indicate that they wish for the abolition of the GOP, you came up with that on your own

      "should not be allowed” which implies prohibition.

      you’re thinking of “shouldn’t be able” bud, at the end of an election there can only be one party allowed into office

      • aidan@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        you’re thinking of “shouldn’t be able” bud

        Actually, I view it as the opposite. Really this is subjective language differences. But should not be allowed to me implies there is rules prohibiting, where’s shouldn’t be able to implies that they should just fail to.