• 0x4E4F@infosec.pubOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    That requires a different mindset and (maybe) a different level of eveolution. Food is free, you take what you need. Services are free, if your house needs something fixed, you call the adequate people, they do the job, that’s it. Same for healthcare, you just go to the doctor, no bill, you just leave (we used to have that around here). Tech products are free, you take what you need (TV, stereo, phone, PC, etc.). You go to work and do the same as everyone else, do your job and go home.

    This is a very simplified version and as I said, it requires a different mindset. We’re not used to that right now, it’s alien to us.

    • BilliamBoberts@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      You have to put someone in charge of distributing the goods and services, set laws to make interactions between parties fair, and divy up resources, and remove/rehabilitate criminals, and that inherently creates a power imbalance. How do you suggest we keep the leaders beholden to the governed in this system so they dont abuse this power?

      • 0x4E4F@infosec.pubOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        You groom them from children. This is an unpopular opinion, but it’s the best solution I could think of. Shamans have done the same in tribes. Some children show empathetic and leadership skills, stading behind the weak and sharing things equaly among siblings and other children. You pick those and groom them from children to take on the burden to be leaders. Yes, this is not fair, they’ll never grow up to choose what they want to be, but so are so many things in life. Sacrifices have to be made for the greater good… and so many far worse things have happened in human history.

        • BilliamBoberts@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Under that system, all leadership would be exclusive and homogeneous, as they would all be a part of some select leadership class, not unlike the nobility class of europe. Picking people from childhood and grooming them to be leaders is no guarantee that they will be good leaders. What do we do if someone is a bad leader in this sytem?

          • 0x4E4F@infosec.pubOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            You resign them from their positions because those leaders will not be the only ones in the country/world, more like a part of a council.

            I have thought about this as well… this is the best I could come up with.

                • BilliamBoberts@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  That concerns me because that creates a conflict of interest if the only people who can invite or remove people from the council are other members of said council. We see in the real world that breeds nepotism and corruption and makes non-violent policy change nearly impossible. Wouldn’t it be better to allow the people to choose council members and remove them by vote when necessary?

                  • 0x4E4F@infosec.pubOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    Yeah, I see your point of view. May be better like that… or a combo of votes maybe (the people and the council).