• TheLurker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    11 months ago

    Ironically I would support religious studies in schools. BUT…

    Only if they teach ALL of them. And I mean all. Like ancient Greek, Roman, Indigenous, Pagan, Hindu…

    I mean let’s teach kids how long this bullshit has been going on for, how many different ideas there are and how the only positive thread amongst them is the idea that we are all one.

    • vpklotar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      11 months ago

      Here in Sweden I had a mandatory religious class. They teaced about Hindu, Buddhism, Christianity and so on. We pretty much learned of all the “major” religions and i would say it was pretty beneficial to us all. Did it have shortcomings? Yes, but it was better to get a broad perspective on things instead of just one thing to be teached as “true”. We also had history parallel with religion which tied them both together pretty nicely.

      • TheLurker@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Without taking too much liberty, can make an assumption? Sweden has a high level of secularism because of this eclectic education when it comes to religious teaching.

        Would that be your assessment?

        • vpklotar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          11 months ago

          I would say that it is probably one of the reasons. Another is that you are just not thaught about religion as a way of living and more just like any other subject like physics or history. It’s more of a objective look at it and what makes up that religion. Like, Hinduism believes a and therefore does b while Christianity believes c and therefore does d and so on.

          It also helps not being raised by religious people of course.

          • TheLurker@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            I thought It might be. I think it would be good if the US adopts this approach.

    • Damage@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      11 months ago

      That’s what we did at my Highschool. Our prof taught us about various religion, including Lavey’s Satanism.

      • ditty@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I’m from the Midwest and I took AP World History which included learning about: Hinduism, Zoroastrianism, Judaism, Christianity (origins, Catholicism and the Reformation), Islam, Buddhism (& Zen Buddhism), and Taoism. Non-AP world history students would’ve also covered some of those too. And this was a public high school.

    • alekwithak@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      Grew up in the UU (Unitarian Universalist) Church and I’m eternally grateful that this was the religious education they offered.

      • TheLurker@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        So this is a spiritual belief with humanitarian ideals mixed with Judaism/Christian idolgy?

        • samus12345@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          It originated from Judeo-Christian ideology (Unitarian as in rejection of the Trinity and Universalist as in everybody is saved), but it encompasses all (benevolent) forms of belief and non-belief now. Super religious or atheist, as long as you practice not being an asshole to the best of your ability, you’re welcome.

    • credit crazy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Honestly I’ve been ok with religions so long as the people who believe don’t equate religious =good. Being moral should always be more than just believing someone will punish you for being bad. the reason religions have hells is to motivate people to be good people. Not to be the definition of morality. And sadly a lot of religious people forget that. What you pray to should effectively just be your culture. Like your choice of clothes or the songs you listen to. Zealoty is the only reason I’m not religious myself.

      • TheLurker@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Imparting a morality is not the same as belief.

        Most religious people don’t have a view, they have a belief.

        Belief is okay, but imposing morality is fucked.

    • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      I agree. Also if someone wants to be religious, they should know about all the options out there and decide what fits their views best instead of being railroaded into the religion of their family.

      It’s like being born into a Republican family and never being exposed to the views of democrats, you just always vote Republican because it’s what your family has told you is the way to do it.