• Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    You’ve claimed that you disagree with this, but have yet to explain why you disagree beyond saying that there would be visual cues.

    I have explained it, multiple times. I disagree that there would not be visual clues most of the time. I can’t prove a negative I don’t belleve in, to me its a false scenario that doesn’t (mostly) happen. In fact, the whole point of my very first comment was to rebut implicitly the ‘no visual clues’ clause.

    Each comment is not atomic, on its own, its part of an overall conversation being had. To try and do so otherwise is just to play “gotcha” and is intellectually dishonest.

    • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      They never said “most of the time.” They only brought up two categories of events: those that leave lasting visual cues, and those that don’t.

      • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        I would just be repeating myself at this point, to respond. Lets just leave it at agree to disagree.