• mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 hours ago

    scientific publishing was hurting bad (signal to noise and ethics issues) before AI… yeah, this is gonna be really bad.

    • ∃∀λ@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      46 minutes ago

      The web also got bad before AI. The last time you could do a web search and find pages written by enthusiastic experts and hobbyists just sharing what they have to say on the topic of your query was, like, 2005. Then, it flipped. The advent of web ads meant people could easily make money from publishing websites. Sounds great. Except it brought in people whose main goal was making money, not sharing what they love. So then the results of your queries are links to pages covering the topic in the most superficial way and the author is a total nobody if you even know who the author is. There are businesses who figure out what users are searching for and then vomit out websites targeting those popular queries.

      The same happened to YouTube. Like 99% of YouTube at this point has to be video essay channels with clickbait videos on superficial topics way longer than they need to be and released on a very frequent schedule. Early YouTube was one hit wonders. Ain’t no incentive to publish regularly without ad revenue.

      The good was being drown out by the bad before AI. AI is only accelerating it.

      The participants in this are so selfishly rotten. I can’t imagine I’d be able to sleep at night.