A Denver Public Schools parent has sued the district over its policy allowing teachers to display Progress Pride flags in their classrooms, saying LGBTQ+ flags “discriminate” against his straight, cisgender, white children.

Nathan Feldman, whose children attend Slavens School in southeast Denver’s Wellshire neighborhood, on Nov. 10 filed the federal suit in the U.S. District of Colorado that states DPS’ policy supporting LGBTQ+ students is “not inclusive of all students” or of his children, who are “heterosexual, Caucasian, and/or binary/’cisgender.'” The lawsuit comes after his unsuccessful attempts to have what he described as a “straight pride” flag displayed in his children’s classrooms.

The lawsuit alleges Feldman and his children have “suffered irreparable harm directly” because of the district’s policy, and it seeks an injunction stopping the district from enforcing the policy that prohibits the straight flag display and a declaratory judgment on the unconstitutionality of the policy.

The lawsuit also seeks $3 million in punitive damages from Slavens School Principal Kurt Siebold, DPS Director of Operations Christina Sylvester, and DPS family constituency specialist Katherine Diaz, who are named individually in the lawsuit as well as the district, the DPS school board, Superintendent Alex Marrero and two of Feldman’s children’s teachers.

According to the lawsuit, Feldman asked the district to display a flag he described in an email as a “straight pride” flag, a black and white striped flag with a linked male and female gender sign on it, in front of his children’s classrooms to include them, but the district did not respond to his request.

“Each day at school, (Feldman’s children) are exposed dozens, if not hundreds, of ‘Progress Pride Flags’ that DPS officials have strung throughout the Slavens School classrooms and halls as a means of expressing and promoting DPS’ favored viewpoint on the topic,” the lawsuit states. “Due to the fact that (Feldman and his children’s) views differ, (Feldman and his children) simply requested to have their views expressed, as well. But DPS has refused, and continues to refuse, to permit (Feldman and his children’s) speech or expression to even exist in its schools.”

Feldman first raised his concerns about pride flags to the district Oct. 6, 2022, according to the lawsuit, after he attended a school event and saw Progress Pride Flags displayed in front of classrooms.

He asked his children’s teachers about the flag displays because “Pride Flags are not inclusive of all Slavens School students and only represent one viewpoint on the topic of sex,” and if he could have the straight pride flag displayed as well.

Neither teacher responded, so he sent a follow-up email that Siebold answered, explaining district policy that supports teachers’ right to display a rainbow flag or any other sign of support for LGBTQ+ students.

The lawsuit alleges Siebold’s response and DPS policy “confirms” the district “does not allow students or staff to speak or express support for students or staff who are not members of the LGBTQIA+ community.”

Siebold later allegedly sent an email that stated, in part, “DPS doesn’t allow for other flags,” according to the lawsuit.

Feldman went back and forth with DPS officials and school administrators and faculty, saying the use of the pride flags and alleged non-allowance for other flags violates the 1st and 14th Amendments to the U.S. Constitution.

He also sent an email to Sylvester, stating he’d like to “follow [Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion policies] to display a straight pride flag with 2 gender symbols” in front of his children’s classrooms.

He met with Siebold and Diaz in January, where Diaz allegedly said, “‘sexual orientation, gender identity and race protections only apply to homosexuals, people of color, and trans people.”

Feldman claims, according to the lawsuit, straight, white, cisgender people should “be members of protected classes or protected against discrimination” because those are parts of sexual orientation, race and gender identity.

Feldman and his children are being represented by Michael Yoder and Chad LaVeglia, two Washington D.C.-based attorneys.

DPS Director of External Communications Scott Pribble said as of Monday the district had not been served the lawsuit, but even if they had could not comment on pending litigation.

  • CaptainEffort@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    But pride flags aren’t discriminating against straight people.

    That’s like arguing that all those flags in support of the police discriminate against non-police officers, and that we now need to have flags for everyone who isn’t an officer. That’s exceedingly dumb.

    • thantik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      28
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Are straight people not allowed to have pride? Are they not allowed representation?

      And likewise, taken this to its end - if someone wanted to have non-officer flags, so long as they were allowed alongside officer flags, that would be okay. There’s firefighter flags, and everything else. The problem is when you tell someone else that they aren’t also allowed representation. So long as his “Straight Pride Flag” doesn’t literally just say “Death to the gays!” - then what harm is there in adding it?

      The discrimination here isn’t the LGBT flags, it’s the inability for someone who doesn’t fit in that category to also have representation.

      • RooPappy@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Are you claiming that straight people are suffering from a lack of representation? Straight people are represented everywhere in every single aspect of every part of all popular culture in every part of the world, and you know that.

        What you’re describing is not a lack of representation, it’s jealousy that someone else is getting attention that you aren’t getting. It seems like less of a movement for equality, and more of a childish temper tantrum, you know?

        But if you want to start a straight pride group, go for it. It’ll definitely do 2 things: 1) Tell everyone around you that you’re the kind of person who would start a straight pride group, and 2) Even if it’s not your intention, it’ll be a LGBT hate group in less than a week, because thats who’s most interested in straight pride.

      • negativeyoda@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yeah. You know who’s had a rough go of things regarding representation?

        checks notes straight, white cisgender men

        What would this flag look like? The Rhodesian flag? A rendering of a white guy shooting chewing tobacco into his dick with an AR15?

        But yeah, file this next to white pride. Nothing sketchy about that

      • Julian@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Straight people already have representation. Plenty of it. Almost every love story in modern western society is straight. The law itself in many places only recognizes straight couples. This has only started to change in the last 10-20 years. The point of pride is to give a heavily marginalized, underrepresented group of people a shared voice and a way to find joy in a society that make it difficult to be that way. Trying to celebrate “straight pride” makes no sense since society doesn’t make it difficult to be straight. We don’t need pride because everything is built for us. And if you still want to join in, you can be an ally - it even has a flag if you want one.

        • thantik@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          But these are children you’re talking about. They have no concept of the history of racism, sexism, the turmoil of the past, etc.

          All they see is all the LGBT kids being celebrated, while they aren’t for some reason. I wonder as a child, what I would do if I saw all this love and pride for people that were gay…I might just want to announce myself gay as well, because I yearned to gain the acceptance and tolerance that those who claimed they were LGBT were getting as well. Even if I weren’t, I would certainly feel pressured to, without representation of my own.

          You have to understand the context of all of this, and you clearly don’t. You’ve decided the stance you’re going to take, and have worked your way backwards to support it rather than thinking about it as a whole, and coming to a sane conclusion from there.

          • Julian@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s a school. If the students have no concept of the history of racism, sexism, homophobia, and transphobia then maybe the school should, you know, educate them?

            Also I went to public school while the gay pride movement was getting mainstream traction, and I was straight and cis. The bullying they had to go through did not make me wish I was gay.

            And not to mention, this article is about an adult arguing for this. There’s no excuse for them not understanding the “turmoil of the past.”

            • thantik@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Do you understand what it was like being a Jew during the holocaust?

              Even though you have been educated about it…do you really? Education doesn’t impart anything more than knowledge. Knowledge is not Understanding.

              And yes, it’s an adult arguing for this, because nobody will listen to a child and children need Adult proxies to argue for things when they can’t. Did your parents never take up arms for you as a child when you were wronged?

              It’s discrimination to display LGBT flags all over the schools and then balk when others want to be represented as well. But it’s clear that you support discrimination, so long as it’s “for the right people”. You’re no different than a Republican.

              My 15 year old daughter has told me multiple times in the past that in school now - if you don’t claim you’re LGBT in some orientation, you get bullied for not being that. So much so that an increasing number of kids say they are just to be left alone about it. My niece of the same age has confirmed it with me as well, because initially I didn’t believe my own daughter. It sounded way too outlandish to actually be true.

              But that sounds like it’s okay with you, because straight people are “the wrong people”.

              • kaffiene@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Don’t assume what people think to match your prejudices. No one is saying that straight people are wrong.

      • kaffiene@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        The majority don’t need representation. The whole of society is made in their image

        • duffman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          The majority you are referring to are simply powerless children, as young as kindergarten, who don’t have a concept of the history behind of the flags and instead see others recognized and honored, but not themselves.