• Silverseren@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    158
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    The actual original stated history near the start of the religion is that Adam and Eve weren’t the “first people” to exist, just the first Jewish/Christian people created by God. Since it was common belief and understanding at the time that other gods also existed from the other religions and created their own peoples.

    Judaism was monotheistic only in regards to following a single god, but it fully recognized other existences in a much larger pantheon.

    It was only later that Jewish and Christian scholars denigrated the existence of other gods to be “demons” worshipped by pagans and thus lower than the “one true god” and all that nonsense.

    • toasteecup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      57
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Jew checking in, can confirm. You can even see evidence of this in the modern translation.

      “Thou shalt have no god before me” doesn’t say anything about after

      • Duder167@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        Doesn’t God mention after eve eats the fruit “they are now like us” also there’s evidence God had a consort named Asherah. The wholes a big dumb mess

        • TehWorld@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          The Christian answer here is that ‘us’ refers to the Father-Son-holy spirit trinity.

      • steakmeout@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Minorly scholarly Jew checking in. That commandment did not exist when Adam and Eve were brought into Creation so it wouldn’t apply. The Ten Commandments, of which the first is, “Thou shalt have no god before me” also does not define belief order. Before is taken as you either follow H-shem or you follow others gods but you cannot follow both. Your confirmation is bunk. Judaism is hereditary, initally patrilineal up until about 10BCE and then it became matrilineal as Jews migrated into other nations and parts of the world.

        • Hyperi0n@lemmy.film
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ignoring the fact that many of the ten sayings are mistranslated. “Thou shalt have no other gods before Me” is actually the second saying in Jewdaism.

          However, your view is correct. It is a prohibition on Idolatry. Many of the proto-Jews probably still worshipped other, singular gods from other religions and this was a means to get everyone on the same track. It was probably created the same time the idea of the LORD/YHWH was formed around 800BCE

          • gowan@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            YHWH is literally straight out of the Caananite pantheon. It is unlikely that they did not at some point worship multiple gods at the same time. Monotheism is introduced later.

      • starlinguk@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s not what before means here. It means you don’t treat other gods as better than me.

        • TheDom@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          Isn’t that exactly what he said? After in this case just meaning worse (translating it your way).

        • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Which is a point I never see theist mention. It doesn’t say that there are no other gods. It says I am the one you are going to pray to. It doesn’t say that because the population didn’t believe it. They “knew” that there were other gods.

          The Bible first chapters are so much different if you just admit what the text is telling you.

    • SixTrickyBiscuits@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      If I understand it right, the Jewish God came from a pantheon, and didn’t just respect other pantheons. Like it was equivalent to a group of people who worshipped the Roman gods and then said “Yeahhh, but we’re going to pick Vulcan as our main guy.”

      • Hyperi0n@lemmy.film
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Proto Jewdism was highly influenced by Egyptian religion. Many themes and plots being pulled from there. It wasn’t until these proto-Jews spent time around Zoroastrianism that the religion really took its modern form.

        There is evidence of proto-Jews worshiping other gods but there is no evidence of worship of more than one God though.

    • gowan@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      Early Judaism was henotheistic in that they recognized others believed in different gods but believed theirs was superior. They later became monotheistic and decided all truth stemmed from their god.

          • sovietknuckles[they]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            What do you mean “no”? Here’s your dictionary.com definition. See #4:

            noun

            1. one of a scattered group of people that traces its descent from the Biblical Hebrews or from postexilic adherents of Judaism; Israelite.

            2. a person whose religion is Judaism.

             

            adjective

            1. Offensive. of Jews; Jewish.

             

            verb (used with object)

            1. jew, Extremely Disparaging and Offensive. to bargain sharply with; beat down in price (often followed by down).: See Usage note at the current entry.

            So again, “Jew” as an adjective is a slur. Say “Jewish” instead, unless you’re using “Jew” as a noun.

  • FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It literally says “Adam and Eve had other sons and daughters” in Gen 5:4. Which doesn’t improve the situation, but at least makes it biologically possible. (Except for where Cain’s wife comes from).

    • turmacar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Cain is also worried about people killing him after he’s banished. Genesis chapter 6 talks about the “Sons of God” finding the “daughters of humans” beautiful.

      The bible treats Adam n’ family like Greek demi-gods or Norse giants that mingle with humans who came from “gestures vaguely”.

      • FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It was probably intended as an origin myth just for Semitic peoples as to why they’re holier than the pagan rabble around them and it just lost its way a bit and ended up confused

        Then the NT comes and doubles down on the whole human race explicitly coming from Adam. Now that I think about it, I can’t think of an OT reference explicitly saying everyone’s from Adam? Maybe the ancient Jews just always knew genesis wasn’t supposed to explain everything?

          • FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            People say there are two genesis creation myths “mashed” together. I think this is true, but not really giving enough credit to the people doing the mashing who I think - as the rest of the literature pans out - not generally in the habit of writing directly contradictory things (usually you have to dig deeper for mistakes, but blatant surface level ones are not so common). They didn’t have science, but they knew how stories worked. I think it’s possible the original editor, when joining the myths together, intended the “man” created in myth 1 (the sixth day) to be understood as humanity in general. And myth two following on immediately is the specific creation of Adam on the eighth day. That would at least explain why Cain’s wife is referred to so casually (as well as the implied peoples Cain is afraid of)

            • maynarkh@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              That’s what I mean, ChatGPT recombines existing stuff without knowing and caring about a larger context. It seems the same thing happened with the Bible, I guess other “holy books” as well. It’s not really a dig at the Bible, more like an interesting parallel between the mechanisms.

        • Lux@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          One interpretation is that 6th day creation is non adam people, and adam was created on the 8th day

          • FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yes! Surprised I’ve not seen that brought up more often. Even if it was an editor working with two origin myths and joining them together, reading it that way at least gives them some credit…

  • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Because it was the origin story of their tribe. It got retroconned to be of the entire human species. You can even see the stitches. Cain is worried about being banished from his tribe because other people will attack him. There are no other people so who would attack him? As you pointed out who did Seth mate with?

    Back in the day every little tribe had their own god and their own story of how they got there.

      • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        If I had a time machine I would love to grab some ancient Hebrew storyteller and show him the utter chaos he is going to unleash. Oh you thought you were just going to tell some stories to kids about Adam for a few shekles? Check this out. Entire wars have been fought over this.

        Imagine the horror of knowing that because you took a breath in your story, it became a pause when written down, which changed the meaning of a verse, which changed another verse, which caused a movement, which caused a counter-movement. And a million people died or were tortured.

        • daemoz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Feels like a shittier wheel of time. They broke the world and now we all had to live through an age of madness feeling ignorant of ancient wonders as New cults are born and repeat the madness

      • MonkderZweite@feddit.ch
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        In the end, everything considered, yes.

        And it wouldn’t be the last pagan god or rite they adopted. What do you think where Beelzebub comes from? Or Moloch? Or even JHWH?

  • flames5123@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    So, most lineages back in the day don’t mention daughters when detailing them.

    However, the Bible actually says, “After the birth of Seth, Adam lived another 800 years and he had other sons and daughters.” So it does document other children. Research just for a second before posting a meme, even if it is against the great sky fairy. Most things in that book do add up somehow.

  • metic@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is a pretty fun rabbit hole to dive down. The para-biblical book Jubilees retells a lot of the Hebrew Bible stories with added details including naming the patriarchs’ wives. A more interesting reading is that because they are omitted in the Genesis account, quite possibly a lot more people were also not mentioned. This led to the “pre-Adamite” doctrine, that Adam and Eve were not the first humans. Of course there’s also the Talmudic account of Lilith which has gained a lot of popularity recently.

  • madcaesar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I still laugh every time those nutbags yell IT’S ADAM AND EVE NOT ADAM AND STEVE!!! 😂

    Like all of this shit isn’t just made up horseshit.

  • Brazzburry@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Everyone knows the first few generations god was like “I’m only dealing in ribs rn you guys but I promise I’ll get this shit worked out soon”

    • complacent_jerboa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      he developed the minimum viable product, and released it as an alpha.

      he already had the reproductive system mostly done on the development branch. he just had some issues to work out, because the CI/CD pipeline wasn’t letting him push his changes (cause it kept failing some obscure unit test Satan wrote earlier)

        • Arigion@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          He invented 100% implementation coverage, where each change in the code needs 10x more changes in tests. Next level is writing tests for tests, because tests are also sofware, which obviously needs testing.

      • III@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Tech: “Sir, we are getting some bug reports from users - racism, genocide, pronouncing it JIF.”

        God: *looks at clock* “After 6000 years those aren’t bugs, they are features.”