In February 2000, Paul Crutzen rose to speak at the International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme in Mexico. And when he spoke, people took notice. He was then one of the world’s most cited scientists, a Nobel laureate working on huge-scale problems – the ozone hole, the effects of a nuclear winter.

So little wonder that a word he improvised took hold and spread widely: this was the Anthropocene, a proposed new geological epoch, representing an Earth transformed by the effects of industrialised humanity.

The idea of an entirely new and human-created geological epoch is a sobering scenario as context for the current UN climate summit, COP28. The impact of decisions made at these and other similar conferences will be felt not just beyond our own lives and those of our children, but perhaps beyond the life of human society as we know it.

  • Sonori@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Um, becuse we care? Because we would rather the rate of it getting worse go down than up?

      • phonyphanty@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Even if they won’t care, it’s normal to want a better future for the people who come after you.

        • Dogyote@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Right, I know and agree. I wanted to pick apart this idea that “they’ll adapt and not try,” but it’s not really going anywhere useful.

          • phonyphanty@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Ah, gotcha. I do understand the anxiety about that though, it’s hard to care when climate change feels so permanent and inevitable.