• lntl@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    there are so many:

    • vehicle maintenance
    • vehicle replacement
    • fuel
    • road repair
    • healthcare
    • fast food

    there are soo many ways that a long commute supports the economy. it could be selfish to not commute in a motor vehicle for less than an hour each way.

    • Chastity2323@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      11 months ago

      This illustrates very well how broken our economic system is lol. What benefits “the economy” (GDP) is not what benefits real people/communities.

      • Chastity2323@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 months ago

        It’s also well documented by strongtowns how car infrastructure specifically devastates local communities and bankrupts cities due to how exorbitantly expensive it is. Long car commutes may increase the GDP of a country, but local areas suffer.

      • Katana314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Look man, I understand that hundreds of dead babies sounds like a tragic thing. But please, think about the jobs created for the people that dig their mass graves.

    • Anekdoteles@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Those are no benefits but just examples for economically uneducated positions. Work is not an end in itself but just a tool. A broken window that is replaced by one miner, one glass producer and one craftsman has less value compared to an unbroken window and 3 persons with free time to create for example a new window.

      Cars and car-centric lifestyles come with incredible economic cost.

    • Cows Look Like Maps@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      So if I’m understanding correctly, your position is that spending money on vehicle maintenance, fuel, healthcare (presumably for treating the depression?) from a long commute is going to improve the economy by an amount greater than how much the “depressive symptoms” impact the economy?

      Or in other words, it’s fine that there are more cases of depression because it benefits the economy. It hinges on the assumption that someone with depression is “bad for the economy” and that the economy matters more than peoples’ suffering. This is an inherently ableist and morally bankrupt perspective, as is usually the case when distilling everything down to a utilitarian equation.

      • lntl@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        it’s incredible isn’t it?

        seems like this is how it works to me anyway