• theneverfox@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    10 months ago

    Not really. It’s all about models - we have for normal stuff, but it breaks apart in extreme situations

    So clearly the model is fundamentally wrong… Which is pretty cool, because it means FTL travel, antigravity, or travel between dimensions could be possible

    But we know now normal shit acts - we have models that work perfectly for 99% of all situations, and we’re probably not going to stop using them. We understand what happens when you throw an object, and it’s a basic equation up until like mock-2 or 3, where our models stop working and we have to switch them out completely

    Can you build a model that works for both? Absolutely. It’ll be closer to the truth even. But it’ll be way more complicated for nearly all practical, human scale situations

    At the end of the day, a model that describes reality exactly is almost useless… Without simplifications to ignore everything not relevant, just trying shit live would be easier than calculating the prediction

    • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      What I don’t understand is if the goal is to eventually be able to model everything perfectly, if we achieve that goal, doesn’t that just mean entropy is a lie?