So, lemmy seems to be flooded with spam bot accounts at the moment. Look through the table of servers on fedidb (https://fedidb.org/software/lemmy) and notice how there are these huge instances without any active users (MAU).
Also notice how startrek.website has 9000 users for 276 active users this month.
From memory, when I signed up, there was no email requirement or captcha or anything.
Admins … maybe you want to tighten things up?
I find it odd that a lot of people communicating that there is a problem and that they are impacted equates to brigading. To me, how can they know how wide reaching a change was if there is only a couple of comments from more savvy admins? There’s a difference between knowing a decision created a problem, and knowing a decision created a BIG far-reaching problem. From my perspective, sometimes we forget to think about the bigger implications of changes and that’s where community pressure and action can come in.
Yeah, I could probably work on my tone a bit. The internet echo chamber has trended my communication style to be more bold, but the fediverse does appear to be ever so slightly different.
Also, haven’t moved to Kbin yet - it’s just tempting - and yes it would be abdicating my responsibility to grow Lemmy and contribute to that project, thus I haven’t done it yet.
As for open-source entitlement - here’s what irks me - Admins are users, indeed, but we’re not the type of user that blog is admonishing, and I’m not asking other admins to become that. I plan to contribute code to the lemmy code base, make some bots, and generally enrich the ecosystem. So when the ecosystem itself is threatened (by spam), I can’t help but sense that this is something bigger than “open-source entitlement”.