Israeli officials are facing backlash after years of Prime Minister Benjamin “Bibi” Netanyahu quietly allowing Hamas to remain in power.

But reporting in the New York Times has revealed that Netanyahu’s government was more hands-on about helping Hamas: they helped a Qatari diplomat bring suitcases of cash into Gaza, indirectly boosting the militant organization, according to the report.

The calculus — the Times reported on Sunday, citing Israeli officials, Netanyahu’s critics, and the man’s own reported statements — was to keep Hamas strong enough to counteract the Palestinian Authority in the West Bank, allowing Netanyahu to avoid a two-state peace solution and keep both sides weak.

Israeli security officials got it wrong; they didn’t think Hamas was capable, or even interested, in launching a large attack against the Jewish state.

  • Tavarin@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Of course they lobbied not to sanction Qatar. Once again how would it look to the world if Israel worked to deny aid to Palestine?

    And I never said Netanyahu was a swell guy, he needs to be removed from power as well as Hamas.

    • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      The whole idea that they wouldn’t want to look bad that way is just stupid. They don’t want to seem like they’d deny aid to Palestine but have no problem shooting peaceful protesters in Gaza? Or doing air strikes? Or having long-term blockade of Gaza which keeps the entire region is a perpetual humanitarian crisis? No, not allowing Qatar to send money to Hamas under the guise of giving the people money is a step too far.

      Oh and Netanyahu is the one who wanted money from Qatar to reach Gaza, other politicians (outside of his influence) were against it. Think about it, why would someone who doesn’t want Gaza to exist make sure that money reaches Gaza?

      • Tavarin@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Given the thousands of rockets fired at Israel by Hamas from Gaza every year, the international community is understanding of a blockade being put in place.

        Denying the passage of aid across that blockade however would be seen as far worse.

        And the current air-strikes are a result of a large scale attack against Israel, so they are seen by many as justified. Though you can see most of the world now sees Israel as going too far. Thus proving that Israel can only get away with so much before their allies drop off.

        • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Given the thousands of rockets fired at Israel by Hamas from Gaza every year, the international community is understanding of a blockade being put in place.

          Is somehow understandable by the international community

          Denying the passage of aid across that blockade however would be seen as far worse.

          Not aid, money. And somehow not understandable by the international community despite the US verifying that the money sent goes to Hamas? So preventing funds for those rockets is not understandable by the international community?

          • Tavarin@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Money is aid. Money can buy food, and water, and whatever other supplies a state needs.

            • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              If money is aid then money is also bombs, rockets, WMD parts etc. Money is just an object of exchange that may be used to buy aid. But it doesn’t make it aid, just like it doesn’t make it a bomb.

              • Tavarin@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                But unlike sending food, it is non-perishable, and can allow a country to buy what it needs. Money is aid.

                • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  In that case money is also bombs and it would actually make sense to prevent it from entering Gaza.

                  • Tavarin@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    And now you have an even worse humanitarian crisis, and a pissed off international community because you’ve denied aid to Gaza. Congrats, you’re a terrible world leader.