• PugJesus@piefed.socialOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    Explanation: The Roman Empire was not a monarchy.

    Really! At least for the first 200-300 years. The Emperor was envisioned not as a monarch or some special person of royalty, but as a (admittedly powerful) official representing the people in a republican government. With extremely vaguely defined limits to their authority, and control over the Legions.

    … so really it was more like a modern strongman regime or a military junta than a monarchy.

    There weren’t ‘rules’ of succession so much as there were a thousand daggers in the dark waiting for their chance to throw their hat in the ring. It’s a once-in-a-(imperial)-lifetime chance to become Emperor - wouldn’t want to hesitate and miss it!