dude@lemmings.worldM to news@lemmings.worldEnglish · 17 days agoVirginia's New 'Assault Firearm' Ban Is Plainly Unconstitutional, a Federal Lawsuit Arguesreason.comexternal-linkmessage-square5linkfedilinkarrow-up121arrow-down11
arrow-up120arrow-down1external-linkVirginia's New 'Assault Firearm' Ban Is Plainly Unconstitutional, a Federal Lawsuit Arguesreason.comdude@lemmings.worldM to news@lemmings.worldEnglish · 17 days agomessage-square5linkfedilink
minus-squareParlimentOfDoom@piefed.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down7·17 days ago unconnected with service in a militia Only if you deliberately ignore half the amendment
minus-squareRamRabbit@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·17 days agoI’m happy you quoted that from the case, as that bit specifically clarifies you still have the rights regardless of connections with a militia; a common point people seem to get confused on.
minus-squareArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·17 days agoThe relevant interpretation is not yours or mine but rather the supreme court’s. You can think that theirs is wrong, but it’s still binding.
Only if you deliberately ignore half the amendment
I’m happy you quoted that from the case, as that bit specifically clarifies you still have the rights regardless of connections with a militia; a common point people seem to get confused on.
The relevant interpretation is not yours or mine but rather the supreme court’s. You can think that theirs is wrong, but it’s still binding.