In a letter to victims who filed a lawsuit against the company, 23andMe blames its breach on customers for reusing passwords.

Hope this isn’t a repeated submission. Funny how they’re trying to deflect blame after they tried to change the EULA post breach.

  • rockSlayer@lemmy.worldEnglish
    69·
    10 months ago

    23andMe is responsible for sandboxing that data, however. Which they obviously didn’t do.

      • rockSlayer@lemmy.worldEnglish
        33·
        10 months ago

        You opt in to share your data with Facebook. Would you still consider it an issue if your data was breached because someone else’s account was hacked?

        • stepanzak@iusearchlinux.fyiEnglish
          51·
          10 months ago

          I would consider normal that my photos that I only share with some people were leaked if one of those people’s accounts got hacked.

        • jimbo@lemmy.worldEnglish
          2·
          10 months ago

          Sure, it’s a breach, but I would blame my idiot friend for re-using passwords. I wouldn’t blame the service for doing exactly what I expected the service to do, and is the reason I chose to use the service in the first place.

          It’s also the reason I’ve very selective about what I share with anyone online, friend or otherwise.

        • JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyzEnglish
          21·
          10 months ago

          If you share your nudes with the “friends only” privacy settings on facebook, and someone else accesses one of your friends accounts because they reused their password and proceeds to leak those photos, is it the fault of Facebook, your friend, the person leaking them, or you?

          Because that is exactly what happened here. Credit stuffing reused passwords and scraping opt-in “friends only” shared data between accounts.

          • rockSlayer@lemmy.worldEnglish
            22·
            10 months ago

            Private health data was compromised as well, on a smaller scale. It doesn’t make sense to blame users for a security breach of a corporation, literally ever. That’s my point. The friend was dumb, and you shared something maybe you shouldn’t have. But that doesn’t also absolve the company of poor security practices. I very strongly doubt that 14,000 people knew or consciously chose to directly share with a collective 7 million people.

            • JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyzEnglish
              3·
              10 months ago

              But they did. All 7 million of them - that’s why their data was visible for those 14000.

              As it says in the article:

              From these 14,000 initial victims, however, the hackers were able to then access the personal data of the other 6.9 million victims because they had opted-in to 23andMe’s DNA Relatives feature. This optional feature allows customers to automatically share some of their data with people who are considered their relatives on the platform.

              Here’s what each and every one of those 7 million people opted in and agreed to:

              https://customercare.23andme.com/hc/en-us/articles/115004659068-DNA-Relatives-The-Genetic-Relative-Basics

    • pearsaltchocolatebarEnglish
      62·
      10 months ago

      Did you not read my comment? Users opt in to sharing data with other accounts, which means if one account is compromised, then every account that allowed them access would have their data compromised too. That’s not on the company, because they feature can’t work without allowing access.