• Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      22
      ·
      4 days ago

      So every other country in the world is justified in comandeering American vessels, because its doing a genocide in Iran and Palestine, right?

      • stoicEuropean@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        That’s whataboutism. I get your hatred for the US. I feel the same. Fuck 'em. But just bc the US and Israel are evil, we shouldn’t suddenly start praising the Russian fascists.

        • doben@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          4 days ago

          Nobody’s praising anyone, you’re jumping to conclusions. If you’d have a good understanding on why you hate the US, you’d focus more on their proxy war in Ukraine to weaken and take out Russia in order to encircle China. It’s not that complicated. That doesn’t mean, that anyone argues in favor of Russia, that’s a dishonest take. I implore you to focus on the actual problem in this world and work from there.

          • Stitch0815@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Sooo

            Russia attacks Ukrain and the US somehow tries to encircle China? Who is jumping to conclusions now?

            You do realize they could just leave? Right?

            Obviously the US is happy to fight against and damage Russia whenever they get the chance. But jumping to China in this case is wild.

            • doben@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              3 days ago

              The US National Security Strategy (2022) says its top priority is “out-competing China and Constraining Russia” and that a key goal is that “Russia’s conventional military will have been weakened” (p.23, p.26).

              A 2024 Foreign Policy analysis from a RAND expert explicitly calls Ukraine “a widening proxy war” with East Asian powers competing on the global stage.

              By now, the US National Security Strategry (2026) shifts to “prioritize deterring China” and says NATO allies should take “primary responsibility for Europe’s conventional defense” (p.10, p.11).

              The US wants to weaken Russia so Europe can handle it by their own, freeing the US to focus on China. Wild stuff!

      • sgnl@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Even though that’s Israel technically, I’d still say yes. The US is propping them up enough that they are liable.

      • CannonFodder@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        The U.S. isn’t directly attacking Palestine, and what it’s done in Iran, while terrible, isn’t genocide. That said, yes the U.S. should face consequences for supporting Isreal as it commits genocide, and for attacking Iran, amongst other things.

        • Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          4 days ago

          The president posted on his own social media, that a civilization will die tonight, and that he’s going to bomb Iran back to the stone age, where they belong. Then he carpet bombed heavily populated civilian centers. That’s the definition of genocide, bud. He’s attacked water treatment facilities, hotels, school, hospitals, etc. I think it’s pretty obvious that your hesitant to call it a genocide, when in reality, it’s fairly obvious.

          • CannonFodder@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            4 days ago

            I am hesitant to call it genocide only because there’s no intent to remove the population - it’s to gain power and access to commerce. It’s certainly war crimes and disgusting. I just think we need to stick to some meaning of genocide - not just blur it in with war crimes, murder, crimes against humanity, etc.

            • Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              4 days ago

              I reiterate: >The president posted on his own social media, that a civilization will die tonight, and that he’s going to bomb Iran back to the stone age, where they belong.

              This is a clear establishment of intent. He has the ability to act on this intent, and then acted upon this intent.

              I know the organs of international justice are slow, and also tilted in the West’s favor, but come on, man. Open your fuckin’ eyes.

              • CannonFodder@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                4 days ago

                Yes. But just saying something like that isn’t the same as doing it. And as I recall when the orange moron said that he backed down and did nothing that night. Maybe I’m just excusing Trump as he’s such a fucking moron and I don’t believe anything he says. He should be drawn and quartered for making such statements as the potus. It’s just that those statements don’t align with the actions by the U.S. so it doesn’t really seem like it is a genocide at this point. But I get your point.