He’s not alone: AOC and others have argued lawmakers should be paid more in order to protect against corruption and make the job more accessible.

  • TechNerdWizard42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    The problem is you don’t pay them very much comparatively and so they take bribes and “gifts” to make up for the salary. Just look at Clarance Thomas. He said he needed a raise or he’d go full on corrupt. He did not get a raise. He went full corrupt.

    • Alto@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Or we could, yknow, actually prosecute the corrupt ones. Likely a pipedream, but there is another option besides overpay them or allow blatant corruption.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Likely a pipedream, but there is another option besides overpay them or allow blatant corruption.

        Yeah. We can do what we do now. Overpay them and allow blatant corruption.

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      The problem is you don’t pay them very much comparatively and so they take bribes and “gifts” to make up for the salary.

      They do this no matter how much money we waste on them.

      • Windex007@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        I hear your point, and it might be true, but it’s only a hypothesis because, in the grand scheme of things, they aren’t paid well relative to other work with significantly lower amounts of responsibility.

        A young software developer working at Netflix or Amazon would be making more than them. A Congress person in a whole foods in silicon valley could very easily be the poorest customer in the store.

        Scarface said “First you get the money, then you get the power, then you get the women”. I believe that this is the American dream, at least in the eyes of people who end up in high government.

        Their path is different though, power comes first, THEN the money, THEN the women. If we paid them at least enough to enable sexy affairs, I think they could round out the three without as much incentive to go full on corrupt

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          We could enlist a corp of hot young women from all over the world , and bring them to a private island ….

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          I hear your point, and it might be true, but it’s only a hypothesis because, in the grand scheme of things, they aren’t paid well relative to other work with significantly lower amounts of responsibility.

          “We should pay these corrupt pieces of shit even more money, and maybe they’ll stop taking bribes” is a hypothesis we’ve tested PLENTY of times. The results are conclusive: the people we put into office are overpaid at any price, and are corrupt no matter how much money we waste on them.

          • Windex007@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            When has this hypothesis been tested in the USA?

            Where are these conclusive results you speak of?

            • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              10 months ago

              When has this hypothesis been tested in the USA?

              Every single time we gave them a raise.

              Where are these conclusive results you speak of?

              They’re still corrupt.

                • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Ok, so we haven’t tested the hypothesis.

                  Yes we have. We keep increasing congress’ pay like you want, and they keep taking bribes like you want.

                  • aberrate_junior_beatnik@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    If someone did a study on whether raising the minimum wage impacts people’s quality of life, raised it a penny, found that people were still in poverty, and said “we should give up on minimum wages,” would that convince you? Your statement, that we’ve raised congressional wages and corruption is still present, is an equivalent argument. No one is arguing that giving politicians any raise will completely eliminate corruption. I would argue that we should give members of congress wages comparable to the amount of money they would get from taking bribes, and the result will be reduced, not eliminated, corruption.