Police were dispatched toward Smith’s residence but were called off when they learned it was a false alarm and that everyone inside the home was safe.

Special counsel Jack Smith, who is overseeing the prosecution of former President Donald Trump in two federal cases, was the target of an attempted swatting at his Maryland residence on Christmas Day.

According to two law enforcement sources, someone called 911 and said that Smith had shot his wife at the address where Smith lives.

Montgomery County Police dispatched units toward the home but were called off when the Deputy U.S. Marshals protecting Smith and his family told police that it was a false alarm and that everyone inside the home was safe.

No arrests have been made in connection with the incident.

  • Neato@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah. When I first heard about swatting you heard about arrests. Now it seems like the cops don’t give a shit.

    When I was in school you’d get a bomb threat in the county once a year or so but they always caught them. How are police so inept now?

    • TowardsTheFuture@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because our phone regulations are absolute shit now and thus it’s much easier to hide this shit with everything now.

        • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t answer my phone either. I have a special Ring tone for the family, that’s it. At work I got moved to a new location and asked me if I needed my phone. I said no and haven’t used the office phone since. I email companies and setup in person meetings or teams meetings. There’s no need for a phone at work if one can just do teams.

        • TowardsTheFuture@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          29
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s the regulations that don’t exist when we’ve got new technology that needs to be regulated that are the problem. And sorry, I don’t have a list of every telephone regulation on me to go through and tell you which ones, nor the time to do so.

            • cogman@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              32
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              VPNs, virtual numbers, voip, and tor are somewhat new and fairly unregulated. It’s dead simple to setup to make a very hard to trace phone call.

              • Pips@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                None of those are traditional phone services, they’re all internet based so regulated differently. I agree they should be regulated as telephone utilities but right now they’re not.

                • cogman@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  15
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  it’s a minor inconvenience for the US Government

                  Citation needed.

                  Even if I granted the US gov as being all seeing, a major problem is that it requires local PD/prosecutors to get the feds involved.

                  I’m not actually on board with attacking this via phone system regulations, but It is fairly easy to make anonymous phone calls using the techniques I pointed out. To actually fix something like this, you’d need every phone number to be registered in person with a star card and to completely outlaw virtual numbers providers with stiff penalties. But even then, there’s the issue of international numbers and illegally spoofing a number. Those can’t be fixed without revamping the telcos which is really hard with the amount of ossified tech in place.

                  This probably won’t happen in my lifetime, but the two things that need to happen are reducing gun ownership and demilitarization of the police. Cops are way too trigger happy, actual consequences when cops murder or harm individuals would go a long way in stopping them from perceiving everyone as an enemy combatant. Pulling guns off the streets would reduce the justifications of busting down doors with a dozen cops ready to shoot anything that moves.

                • cogman@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  19
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Oh go on, come up with something instead of just downvoting me. I know it’s hard, actual work even, but you’re never gonna change minds otherwise.

                  Dude, I just responded to you and did not downvote, calm down. Maybe take some of your own advice about anger?

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      When I was in school you’d get a bomb threat in the county once a year or so but they always caught them.

      I’m actually surprised about that. Maybe you went to school at a different time from me? I graduated in 1995. A couple of times a year, some kid (probably) would call in a bomb threat so they could get out of a test or whatever and they never got caught. We had a pay phone right outside the school, which didn’t help.

    • prole@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      The cops probably like it because they get to LARP like it’s Call of Duty for a few hours.