• Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Dense and ugly are not synonyms, same with lacking character. If you go to sprawling suburbia, you’ll find that there’s exactly no character, you can drive for 30 minutes and think you went in a circle.

    Do you genuinely believe people want sprawling hellscapes where they have to sit in traffic forever to get to the nearest Walmart, destroying the environment and further atmozing individuals and alienating themselves, or do you think it makes more sense to address population needs, environmental needs, and efficiency via smarter urban planning that isn’t so car-centric?

    Car-centric infrastructure takes up for more space and far more time is spent on commuting than well-planned urban infrastructure with public transit, and costs the environment far more, and is far more economically expensive. It’s disastrous and should be stopped entirely.

    • schmidtster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      23
      ·
      10 months ago

      Ugly and character are both subjective, your opinion isn’t the correct one. Nor is someone’s else’s, but one side is vocal while the other trudges along allowing the other to do and get what they need and want.

      Some people do, yeah. Do you seriously think people don’t want that? People literally drive trucks as a career lmfao, yeah lots of people love it, in fact, they are the majority and you are the vocal minority. Get a grip on reality lmfao.

      • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        No.

        People absolutely loath getting stuck in traffic, and the existence of truckers does not mean that the majority of people love traffic and wasted space, fighting over parking, wasting tons of money, and destroying the environment.

        You implied that dense requires ugliness and lacking character, which is the exact opposite of reality. Car-centric infrastructure is incredibly ugly and lacks any and all character, it’s just roads and parking garages, traffic, and pollution.

        • schmidtster@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          18
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          No some people don’t mind being stuck in traffic. If it makes your drive 4x longer because of bad design that’s different. At the worst in my large city it’s 50% longer to get across the city unless there’s an accident. That 20 minutes to a whopping 30 minutes to travel the almost 40km from north to south.

          Its ugly and lacks character because its dense, I’m sorry you can’t understand other peoples opinions and only yours apparently is valid.

          • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Name one person that either enjoys or doesn’t mind being stuck in traffic. Your example of the worst case scenario being an accident is a problem that is caused by car-centric infrastructure.

            Density is not ugly nor does it lack character, that’s an absurd statement. Ugly things can be dense, but to claim that Density itself is ugly is absurd.

            • schmidtster@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              16
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              Ah yes you can’t seem to understand out of the over 7 billion people on this planet, they all must share your opinion.

              Nice bubble you live in.

              And hey, I love it, now you do know one. But I’m not the only one and to claim that would be the asinine and absurd thing. Not to think that someone could have a differing opinion. You realize lots of people CHOOSE to live in these cities and aren’t forcedor anything yeah? Just because you feel that way doesn’t mean everyone does, sorry. And sorry I forgot you can’t seem to comprehend this, maybe I should drop this extremely obvious point that pokes flaws in your view….

              Nice community you have here lmfao.

              • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                10 months ago

                “No you don’t understand, because there are a bunch of people, the majority loves excruciating pain and CBT.”

                You’re arguing for inefficient and slow infrastructure on the grounds that efficiency is bad and inefficiency is fun for you personally.

                • schmidtster@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  10
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  I’m saying it can all exist together if you were actually paying attention.

                  And comparing a minor inconvenience to torture, that’ll get people to understand your side… good job!

                  • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    8
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    You’re saying people love inconvenience and that’s why everyone should bend over backwards to support the overwhelmingly inconvenient infrastructure to maintain inefficient and inconvenient traditions.

                    It’s anti-science and anti-progress, lol

      • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        https://youtu.be/7Nw6qyyrTeI?si=4Dhz8B-6AYK677PO

        You may want to look at the economic downsides to sprawl. If you really want sprawl, then you’re gonna have to pay for it, cause we’re sick of paying for your roads, and the people who live in the cities pay for everyone else’s roads, and we want walkable/bikeable cities with cars being excluded to a few parking structures on the edge of the city.