• ebikefolder@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why has it to be either, or? We need both. Systemic and behavioural changes on all levels. And we need it now. We no longer have any time left to shift the blame back and forth! I’m getting so sick of this blame game!

    • Anemia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s 100% personal responsibility, it’s just that part of that responsibility is to vote/convince others for more systemic change. All the kids just blaming the “biggest 100 companies” while not voting and making no lifestyle changes are just as bad as the people they critizise.

      • ebikefolder@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        If you put it this way: sure. And those famous “biggest 100 companies”, which are constantly used as a cheap excuse to not do anything on a personal level, are run by maybe 1,000 or so individuals. And employ a few 100,000 individuals.

        All decisions are 100% personal responsibility, because entities like corporations or nations can’t decide anything. It’s always individual people.

        • Anemia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah I mean I agree with you. Most people who won’t even take basic personal actions like not flying on vacation twice a yeah and not buying a stupid oversized car. If those people were put in the same position as these CEOs you can bet your left buttcheek that they would maximize profits in the exact same way. We need to both take individual action and also hold each other accountable by changing the law and applying social pressure.

      • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        What does voting for Capitalism have to do with helping the environment? They are 100% orthogonal to each other.

        • Anemia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I didn’t even mention capitalism? Are you responding to the wrong person? My argument is that people ought to vote for the more environmental option.

          • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            The fact that you don’t even realize that capitalism is the problem and then you think voting for one of the two capitalist parties will fix anything, shows you don’t care about the problem enough to think deeply about it at all.

            • Anemia@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Even if I agreed with you, voting is still important. We need to do what we can in the current situation even if you don’t think it is the full solution.

              What type of action do you propose instead?

                • Anemia@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Out of curiosity, what does that actually mean (political, personal, etc)? What kind of actions have you done in this category?

                  I agree that some forms of actions against companies could be valuable, but as a way to change public opinion.

                  • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    6
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    These actions shouldn’t be discussed on public forums as they are the only actions that can threaten the status quo in anyway and thus are highly discouraged.